Re: Towards #13132 - Extend the default length of pdftex log lines

2025-05-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 02:06:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:08:24AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > Can someone on windows confirm the attached patch works? > > (Mac would be also nice but I am reasonably confident this works there as > > well.) > > > > Just

Re: owards #13132 - Extend the default length of pdftex log lines

2025-05-17 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:08:24AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Can someone on windows confirm the attached patch works? (Mac would be also nice but I am reasonably confident this works there as well.) Just compile the introduction manual, go to the Document->LaTeX log and check that at the very e

Re: Towards #13132 - Extend the default length of pdftex log lines

2025-05-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:56:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 17 mai 2025 22:07:46 GMT+02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >I would like to get your feedback wrt #13132. > > > >TeXLive > 2020 implements option for extending the default length of > >la/pdf/lua/xe/tex log lines >

Re: Towards #13132 - Extend the default length of pdftex log lines

2025-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 17 mai 2025 22:07:46 GMT+02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >Hi, > >I would like to get your feedback wrt #13132. > >TeXLive > 2020 implements option for extending the default length of >la/pdf/lua/xe/tex log lines >(e.g. pdflatex -cnf max_print_line=999) which would be helpful - our log >parser wo

Towards #13132 - Extend the default length of pdftex log lines

2025-05-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Hi, I would like to get your feedback wrt #13132. TeXLive > 2020 implements option for extending the default length of la/pdf/lua/xe/tex log lines (e.g. pdflatex -cnf max_print_line=999) which would be helpful - our log parser would catch more cases when citation/reference is missing in the lat

Re: label whitespaces no more

2025-05-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 18.05.2025 um 00:23 +1200 schrieb Igor: > I think secref has been already pre-defined by refstyle, but sssref > wasn't, hence the above definition is used and leads to the error. This is fixed for LyX 2.5. Too much to backport for LyX 2.4. As Danie wrote, this is due to the way we

Re: label whitespaces no more

2025-05-17 Thread Daniel Els
Igor Please note that refstyle has its own definitions for all the different types of references such as lists \xxxref{lbl1, lbl2, lbl3, ...}, ranges. Your command \sssref{} is just a standard latex definition. In refstyle the argument is processed further. Please read the documentation- refstyle.

Re: label whitespaces no more

2025-05-17 Thread Igor
While it worked for some *predefined* refs, such as secret and even subsecref, for automatically generated custom refs, the brackets method for dealing with whitespaces doesn't work: \label{sec:A B} \secref{{A B}} -- works! \label{sss:A B} \sssref{{A B}} -- doesn't work: LaTeX Warning: Reference

Backport of change 391ed04cd2cbdce18178464c69967063945ce303

2025-05-17 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi Riki, I’d like to put the change 391ed04cd2cbdce18178464c69967063945ce303 in 2.4.x branch. It allows build no current macOS versions. BR Stephan build-script.patch Description: Binary data -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel