Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 21:25 +0200 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On current master, these tests are now failing:
Fixed with fc6e62539dc715.
--
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/
Am Montag, dem 28.04.2025 um 00:29 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/04/2025 à 21:12, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> > With this work, which is fantastic, it really seems to me like we
> > are ready to start thinking about potentially considering maybe
> > moving toward 2.5.0. Not to b
Le 27/04/2025 à 21:12, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
With this work, which is fantastic, it really seems to me like we are
ready to start thinking about potentially considering maybe moving
toward 2.5.0. Not to be too definitive about it!
I agree that this is fantastic. Congrats to Jürgen fo
Riki, "Lyx-devel":
This seems to be good news.
Is this "fix" now in the publicly downloadable version? (If so, I plan to
update the version of LyX that I use. If not, when might it be available and
would you let me know when it becomes available?)
Also, with the new version, how would I set th
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:51:18PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > The problem with the AMS file is that lyx2lyx (2.4) inserts local
> > layout code using the old theorem definition via preamble, and this
> > causes the co
With this work, which is fantastic, it really seems to me like we are
ready to start thinking about potentially considering maybe moving
toward 2.5.0. Not to be too definitive about it!
JMarc, I'm curious what you think about this, and what plans you might
have for improvements, and when you t
On 4/27/25 2:11 PM, thomas.j.buckho...@gmail.com wrote:
Riki, "Lyx-devel":
This seems to be good news.
Is this "fix" now in the publicly downloadable version? (If so, I plan to
update the version of LyX that I use. If not, when might it be available and would you
let me know when it becomes a
Am Sun, 27 Apr 2025 12:51:18 +0200
schrieb "Jürgen Spitzmüller" :
> Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > The problem with the AMS file is that lyx2lyx (2.4) inserts local
> > layout code using the old theorem definition via preamble, and this
> > causes the con
Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> The problem with the AMS file is that lyx2lyx (2.4) inserts local
> layout code using the old theorem definition via preamble, and this
> causes the conflict.
>
> I think we need a file format change here and modify the local
Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> The MM problem is different, I have to check what theorem mechanism
> this class actually uses. It doesn't seem to be amsthm, as I assumed.
Monthly is fixed. The theorem definitions have been output before the
mm-monthly packa
Am Samstag, dem 26.04.2025 um 12:05 +0200 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> The following ctests are failing on current master:
>
> export/examples/Articles/American_Mathematical_Society_%28AMS%29_lyx2
> 2 (Failed)
The problem with the AMS file is that lyx2lyx (2.4) inserts local
layout code using the o
11 matches
Mail list logo
