lyx2lyx bug in 2.x -> 1.6.x

2023-01-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
There is a minor issue in an old lyx2lyx routine in lyx_2_0.py that I describe below. If we do multiple roundtrips with KOMA-Script_Book.lyx back to the format used for LyX 1.6.x, there is no convergence. If I do the following command: lyx -e lyx16x KOMA-Script_Book.lyx && lyx -e lyx16x KOMA-S

Re: Backport this compiler fix to 2.3.x?

2023-01-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 06:50:29PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 1/5/23 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Can we backport cd995a2bc6449c8d9d3dee494ecffcf9abdcb50f to 2.3.x? > > > > When compiling 2.3.x on Ubuntu 22.10, I get a linker error that this > > fixes. > > I've cherry-picked it

Re: Backport this compiler fix to 2.3.x?

2023-01-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/5/23 13:10, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Can we backport cd995a2bc6449c8d9d3dee494ecffcf9abdcb50f to 2.3.x? When compiling 2.3.x on Ubuntu 22.10, I get a linker error that this fixes. I've cherry-picked it. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/l

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/5/23 11:43, José Matos wrote: On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 10:53 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: I will guess that this got fixed for 2.4, and it was decided it couldn't be fixed properly for 2.3. Riki I found it: https://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX24#handling Whom shall I "blame"? :-D If ha

Backport this compiler fix to 2.3.x?

2023-01-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Can we backport cd995a2bc6449c8d9d3dee494ecffcf9abdcb50f to 2.3.x? When compiling 2.3.x on Ubuntu 22.10, I get a linker error that this fixes. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread José Matos
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 10:53 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I will guess that this got fixed for 2.4, and it was decided it > couldn't > be fixed properly for 2.3. > > Riki I found it: https://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX24#handling Whom shall I "blame"? :-D If had to bet I would say Jürgen

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/5/23 08:43, José Matos wrote: On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 13:06 +, José Matos wrote: FWIW this does not happen in 2.4. On further analysis the latex code created by LyX 2.3 and 2.4 is different and only correct on 2.4 so this seems to be on purpose. Since I am used to work with 2.4 I was su

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread José Matos
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 13:06 +, José Matos wrote: > > FWIW this does not happen in 2.4. On further analysis the latex code created by LyX 2.3 and 2.4 is different and only correct on 2.4 so this seems to be on purpose. Since I am used to work with 2.4 I was surprised with 2.3 behaviour. -- J

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:06:13PM +, José Matos wrote: > Does anyone else see this? Yes and it's the same in 2.3.6 as far as I can see. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [LyX/master] Fix compilation problem

2023-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/01/2023 à 05:10, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The point of string_view is to avoid a copy here. Even with the use of const &, a copy has to be made of the original constant string, a const char *. Would it be OK to use instead: +        Attributes(bool o, const char * entity) ?? I th

Re: LyX 2.3.7

2023-01-05 Thread José Matos
On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 17:03 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Binaries and tarballs have been uploaded to FTP. I'll do the actual > release after giving the mirrors a day to sync. > > Riki For some reason I am unable, in 2.3.7, to add Comments or Greyed Out notes in a Section paragraph. In t