Am Freitag, dem 23.04.2021 um 15:21 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I do not think the new GUI behavior is good
Proceed as you see fit. Fine with me.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:39:05PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I can't find the exact message where this issue was raised, but it would be
> useful to check if the generated ePub files are valid. Most of the process
> relies on external dependencies, so I don't think it's reall
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:16:43PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 4/23/21 11:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:51:47PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 12:22:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >>> Open a new file and attempt to
On 4/23/21 11:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:51:47PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 12:22:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>> Open a new file and attempt to activate a module with missing requires.
>>> I get an assertion in GuiIdListMod
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:51:47PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 12:22:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > Open a new file and attempt to activate a module with missing requires.
> > I get an assertion in GuiIdListModel, due to our attempting to set an
> > invalid
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:20:28PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:37:53PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > That makes sense. I think I might add that to my converters as well. I
> > understand the idea of having the setting as a document setting since it
> > changes LaTeX c
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 06:58:16AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 22.04.2021 um 13:18 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I wonder if using branches would be a better way to achieve the
> > desired workflow above. I believe we should preserve the previous
> > default behavior
Hi,
given than Qt 5.15 LTS is not free-licensed anymore, esp. windows
releases might profit from the following:
https://dot.kde.org/2021/04/06/announcing-kdes-qt-5-patch-collection
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:37:53PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> That makes sense. I think I might add that to my converters as well. I
> understand the idea of having the setting as a document setting since it
> changes LaTeX code. But I wonder if most users would prefer a
> preference.
>
> Wou
