Re: [RFC] Enable Continuous Spellcheck By Default For New Users?

2021-01-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mo., 11. Jan. 2021 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb José Abílio Matos < jama...@lyx.org>: > On Monday, January 11, 2021 8:15:47 PM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > Ping on this. We should make a decision about this before too long. > > +1 > I don't have a strong stance, but I am OK with the proposed

Re: Insets and Apply

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 4:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:14:18AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Am Samstag, dem 09.01.2021 um 21:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly >> Heck: >>> I'm a bit unsure what we want to do here. Should we disconnect the >>> dialogs on cursor movement perhaps?

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 2:18 PM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 1/11/21 3:59 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > Today in the virtual meeting we discussed several of the issues regarding > the next major version for the stable release. > > I am proposing here to change to a Semantic Versioning sch

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/01/2021 à 22:30, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit : > > The basic principle of semantic versioning is based on the notion of > > public API. What is the public API of LyX? > > The file format, layout file format and pref file format. These

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/01/2021 à 22:30, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit : The basic principle of semantic versioning is based on the notion of public API. What is the public API of LyX? The file format, layout file format and pref file format. These are stable across stable versions. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing lis

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:00, José Abílio Matos wrote: > Today in the virtual meeting we discussed several of the issues regarding > the next major version for the stable release. > > I am proposing here to change to a Semantic Versioning scheme. This can is > best described here: > > https://sem

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Monday, January 11, 2021 9:06:27 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I would prefer to ignore the last 0 be default, since the sub-releases > are rare. > > Thus: 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.2.1 > > I do not like extra numbers that almost never move. > > And it makes parsing of version number more inter

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 3:59 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: Today in the virtual meeting we discussed several of the issues regarding the next major version for the stable release. I am proposing here to change to a Semantic Versioning scheme. This can is best described here: https://semver.org/

Re: Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/01/2021 à 21:59, José Abílio Matos a écrit : Today in the virtual meeting we discussed several of the issues regarding the next major version for the stable release. I am proposing here to change to a Semantic Versioning scheme. This can is best described here: https://semver.org/

Change LyX release numbering to Semantic Versioning

2021-01-11 Thread José Abílio Matos
Today in the virtual meeting we discussed several of the issues regarding the next major version for the stable release. I am proposing here to change to a Semantic Versioning scheme. This can is best described here: https://semver.org/ So I am proposing for the next version to be 3.0.0. The

Re: Legacy graphics conversion problems

2021-01-11 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Friday, January 8, 2021 4:05:39 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I have no idea about that, but I am the kind of guy who thinks that we > do not care about dvi file... IIRC the preview mechanism used the dvi output. I am quite happy to use the preview even although I do not know how this w

Re: [RFC] Enable Continuous Spellcheck By Default For New Users?

2021-01-11 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Monday, January 11, 2021 8:15:47 PM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Ping on this. We should make a decision about this before too long. +1 -- José Abílio-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [RFC] Enable Continuous Spellcheck By Default For New Users?

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Ping on this. We should make a decision about this before too long. On 12/1/20 3:53 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, It has been suggested on the list that some (perhaps many) new users don't realize that LyX can do continuous spellcheck and would very much like it if it did. So it

Re: LyX 2.4 Status Update

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 1:38 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Mo., 11. Jan. 2021 um 18:36 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: I've just uploaded Eugene's Windows binaries to the ftp server and will wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync before doing the alpha 1 release. Once

Re: LyX 2.4 Status Update

2021-01-11 Thread Yu Jin
Am Mo., 11. Jan. 2021 um 18:36 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > I've just uploaded Eugene's Windows binaries to the ftp server and will > wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync before doing the alpha 1 release. > Once that's done, we should start getting more feedback. But,

Re: LyX 2.4 Status Update

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 1:22 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:36:01PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: That said: Are there any new features people would still like to get into 2.4 that require format changes? I still hope to find some time to fix hyperref settings as discussed in https:

Re: LyX 2.4 Status Update

2021-01-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:36:01PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > That said: Are there any new features people would > still like to get into 2.4 that require format changes? I still hope to find some time to fix hyperref settings as discussed in https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@list

Re: Insets and Apply

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 4:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:14:18AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Samstag, dem 09.01.2021 um 21:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: I'm a bit unsure what we want to do here. Should we disconnect the dialogs on cursor movement perhaps? Then they ca

What Localized Manuals Are Maintained?

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Before I send a note asking for help with the copy-paste stuff, what localized manuals are currently maintained? I.e., for which languages do we need to copy over the new and changed material? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-dev

LyX 2.4 Status Update

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
I've just uploaded Eugene's Windows binaries to the ftp server and will wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync before doing the alpha 1 release. Once that's done, we should start getting more feedback. But, as was said in our developer's meeting today, the master branch is pretty stable, so we h

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-11 Thread Yu Jin
Am Mo., 11. Jan. 2021 um 13:48 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 07:37:13AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > > Since there were no other proposals I just compiled in C++17 mode. I > didn't > > increase the Version Build number (still Installer-1), because I thought > > that makes the most

Re: [LyX/master] Fix bug #4241: Addition to Intro

2021-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/11/21 4:54 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 04:17:17AM +0100, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: commit ed2d3e199f2f1d7c80c336d68a0201b217823648 Author: Richard Kimberly Heck Date: Sat Jan 9 22:17:52 2021 -0500 Fix bug #4241: Addition to Intro --- lib/doc/Intro.lyx

Re: [LyX/master] Simplify checking whether files are controlled by SVN and GIT.

2021-01-11 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Saturday, January 9, 2021 10:38:21 PM WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > That does sounds like a good idea, so as to avoid overhead of separate > processes. I have no idea if it's doable, but I like your strategy: > whenever José proposes something time-consuming, I will reframe it into > having to do

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 07:37:13AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > Since there were no other proposals I just compiled in C++17 mode. I didn't > increase the Version Build number (still Installer-1), because I thought > that makes the most sense for testing releases, also for the registry. > Uploaded as usu

Re: [LyX/master] Fix bug #4241: Addition to Intro

2021-01-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 04:17:17AM +0100, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > commit ed2d3e199f2f1d7c80c336d68a0201b217823648 > Author: Richard Kimberly Heck > Date: Sat Jan 9 22:17:52 2021 -0500 > > Fix bug #4241: Addition to Intro > --- > lib/doc/Intro.lyx| 58 ++

Re: Insets and Apply

2021-01-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:14:18AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 09.01.2021 um 21:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > I'm a bit unsure what we want to do here. Should we disconnect the > > dialogs on cursor movement perhaps? Then they can remain open and > > won't act