Am Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:14:40 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:42:59 +0300
> schrieb Yuriy Skalko :
>
> > > I meant,
> > > if what you done is correct, then also the call in ForkedCalls.cpp should
> > > be
> > > corrected.
> > >
> > > Both places refer to WIN32 anyway.
> > >
Am Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:42:59 +0300
schrieb Yuriy Skalko :
> > I meant,
> > if what you done is correct, then also the call in ForkedCalls.cpp should
> > be
> > corrected.
> >
> > Both places refer to WIN32 anyway.
> >
> > Kornel
>
>
> Since pclose (Unix) returns signed int and GetEx
> I meant,
> if what you done is correct, then also the call in ForkedCalls.cpp should be
> corrected.
>
> Both places refer to WIN32 anyway.
>
> Kornel
Since pclose (Unix) returns signed int and GetExitCodeProcess (Windows)
returns unsigned DWORD, and then result is compared with -1 i
Le 09/09/2020 à 13:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
It's definitely big improvement. I would say that 2.3 version was still better,
but I can live with the current version.
Let's keep it like that for now then.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listi
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:01:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/09/2020 à 11:00, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > Do you have a concrete case in mind where deriving requirements from the
> > > contents of the macro goes wrong? Note that in this case, we could decide
> > > that the re
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:30:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 25/08/2020 ?? 16:24, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 04:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >>>No. Note however that is is a 1 pixel difference.
> >>
> >>On the screenshot I sent it was 3 pixels for protecte
Le 09/09/2020 à 11:00, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Do you have a concrete case in mind where deriving requirements from the
contents of the macro goes wrong? Note that in this case, we could decide
that the requirements given to the macro override whatever is decided from
its contents.
The poin
Le 25/08/2020 à 16:24, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 04:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
No. Note however that is is a 1 pixel difference.
On the screenshot I sent it was 3 pixels for protected and 1 for thin.
3 pixels *difference*
Indeed, I decided at the time hat having
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:33:44AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/09/2020 à 01:41, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > No, you did it right. My point was that the other patch was only hiding
> > > the problem.
> >
> > In the absence of comments from JMarc, I committed the patch at fcd14d
Le 07/09/2020 à 19:10, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Looks good, thanks for the fix. There is a small difference in exported
LaTeX, which is that 2.3.x produces "\int\limits _{" and master does not
output a space after limits: "\int\limits_{". I'm guessing this is
expected, and the output from master
Le 09/09/2020 à 01:41, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
No, you did it right. My point was that the other patch was only hiding
the problem.
In the absence of comments from JMarc, I committed the patch at fcd14df2.
Sorry for not responding earlier. For me the fact that macros take their
dependenc
11 matches
Mail list logo
