Le 09/09/2020 à 01:41, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
No, you did it right. My point was that the other patch was only hiding
the problem.

In the absence of comments from JMarc, I committed the patch at fcd14df2.

Sorry for not responding earlier. For me the fact that macros take their dependencies from their contents is a feature, because this is what we want in general: with the spacing code introduced in 2.3, it is almost always possible to use the real macro definition. In the case of \int, all we have to do is to impose requirements to \oint.

Do you have a concrete case in mind where deriving requirements from the contents of the macro goes wrong? Note that in this case, we could decide that the requirements given to the macro override whatever is decided from its contents.

JMarc

--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Reply via email to