Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Op 01-09-2020 om 22:21 schreef Enrico Forestieri: We already have an elegant solution. We rely on Qt to do the right thing with QFontDatabase::addApplicationFont(), but on linux it does not work right, contrarily to Windows (and I think MacOS) where it works well. In this case it should suffice t

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:37:15PM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 13:54, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:20 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:54:29 +0200 > > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:4

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:55, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:32:59 -0400 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > This is impressing. > > > > +1 > > > > Scott > > These 2 are crashing > examples/de/Modules/Linguistics.ly

CMake file and Visual C++ choking on LYX_WALL

2020-09-01 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
Dear list, I just tried to enable more warnings with Visual C++. According to INSTALL.cmake, it should be enough to set LYX_WALL to 1, but I get these warnings from the compiler: cl : Command line warning D9002 : ignoring unknown option 'Wp64' In CMakeLists.txt:1091 to 1093, I indeed find that,

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 13:54, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:20 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:54:29 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:41:35 +0200 > > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > So, there is something fishy .

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:21:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Another option would be to patch the sources for packaging and rename > > esint10.ttf to e.g. lyxesint10.tff as well as all occurences of esint > > in the code (most important would be symbols file). > > > > Yet another option

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Op 01-09-2020 om 22:21 schreef Enrico Forestieri: We already have an elegant solution. We rely on Qt to do the right thing with QFontDatabase::addApplicationFont(), but on linux it does not work right, contrarily to Windows (and I think MacOS) where it works well. In this case it should suffice t

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:03:35PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:56:43PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > > I have some additional information on top of my previous response with the > > screenshots. When I leave the tex fonts enabled and I link the lyx fonts > > into /usr/share/fo

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:46:10PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > Sorry to jump very late in this threat, only saw it today. > > I don't use LyX for math, so that part I don't know anything about, but I > use openSUSE and maintain LyX there, so I am interested to get this right. > > By default I disabl

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Op 01-09-2020 om 21:03 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:56:43PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: I have some additional information on top of my previous response with the screenshots. When I leave the tex fonts enabled and I link the lyx fonts into /usr/share/fonts in the folder lyx, nothi

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Op 01-09-2020 om 21:03 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: I have made two screenshots, one with the fonts from texlive enabled (with-texfonts) and the other disabled (without-texfonts through fontconfig. Unfortunately this is somewhat older test file

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:56:43PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > I have some additional information on top of my previous response with the > screenshots. When I leave the tex fonts enabled and I link the lyx fonts > into /usr/share/fonts in the folder lyx, nothing changes, but if I name the > link zlyx

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > I have made two screenshots, one with the fonts from texlive enabled > (with-texfonts) and the other disabled (without-texfonts through fontconfig. Unfortunately this is somewhat older test file, I would like to check that limits around \

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Op 01-09-2020 om 18:13 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:46:10PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: As far as I can see the esint fonts are working nicely in LyX. Hi Cor, would you mind posting your screenshot of lib/fonts/test/check_glyphs.lyx with Tools>Preferences>Display>Instant preview

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Hi Pavel, Op 01-09-2020 om 18:13 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:46:10PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: As far as I can see the esint fonts are working nicely in LyX. Hi Cor, would you mind posting your screenshot of lib/fonts/test/check_glyphs.lyx with Tools>Preferences>Display>Insta

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:46:10PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > As far as I can see the esint fonts are > working nicely in LyX. Hi Cor, would you mind posting your screenshot of lib/fonts/test/check_glyphs.lyx with Tools>Preferences>Display>Instant preview off? Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Cor Blom
Sorry to jump very late in this threat, only saw it today. I don't use LyX for math, so that part I don't know anything about, but I use openSUSE and maintain LyX there, so I am interested to get this right. By default I disable all texlive fonts for the UI by linking the 58-texlive-* config

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:32:59 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > This is impressing. > > +1 > > Scott These 2 are crashing examples/de/Modules/Linguistics.lyx: assertion templates/Articles/REVTeX_%28V._4.1%29.lyx: assertion B

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > This is impressing. +1 Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:50:38PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 8/31/20 6:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm less than sure that the DocBook export we have in stable is really > correct. I think that's part of what got Thibaut working on this: Our > export *isn't* right for current fl

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:49:15 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:11:56PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:08:31PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > > At this moment I would like to ask other people on this list, whether > > > they can su

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:44:04PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 8/31/20 4:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:11:56PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> b) docbook export is completely new and we are not really breaking old > >>legacy. My suggestion is that if f

Re: display of $int...$ under QT5

2020-09-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:11:56PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:08:31PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > At this moment I would like to ask other people on this list, whether > > they can sucesfully load fonts/test/check_glyphs.lyx and display > > esint glyphs (in

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:54:09 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:20 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:54:29 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:41:35 +0200 > > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > So, there is s

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:20 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:54:29 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:41:35 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > So, there is something fishy ... and 'git log' did not change. > > > Unfortunately I am no a gi

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:49:25 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:27:52PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > If I see similar changes in the code I can check again, but I still > > > think that having the codebase for others in master is at the moment > > > more valuable than c

Re: DocBook v2

2020-09-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:27:52PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > If I see similar changes in the code I can check again, but I still > > think that having the codebase for others in master is at the moment > > more valuable than clean docbook tests, which might not be even correct > > from the