On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:55, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:32:59 -0400 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > This is impressing. > > > > +1 > > > > Scott > > These 2 are crashing > examples/de/Modules/Linguistics.lyx: assertion > templates/Articles/REVTeX_%28V._4.1%29.lyx: assertion > > Both in src/support/docstring.cpp:53 > LATTEST(static_cast<unsigned char>(ascii[i]) < 0x80); >
I did not get a problem on that line with Linguistics.lyx (I did not yet have a look at the other file yet), but I suppose it is now fixed. (At least, before my last few commits, my code crashed on Windows, and now I get an almost perfect DocBook document.) I still have a strange issue happening with Linguistics.lyx, but it produces valid XML without assertions, so the test should be fixed for now. I would be interested if you could run the tests with the latest changes :) (I did not yet manage to get them running here: since I reconfigured the whole project, the test suite seems much shorter…). By the way, would it be possible to include validity checks in the test suite? That would mean calling a Java library to ensure that the DocBook documents follow the specifications (which is a much stronger constraint than simply valid XML). Basically, with jing.jar accessible in the Java path (https://relaxng.org/jclark/jing.html), it would just mean that command for each file.xml: java -jar jing.jar docbook.rng file.xml docbook.rng comes from https://docbook.org/xml/5.2b09/rng/ (latest version right now). There are other implementations than Jing, like https://github.com/tlocke/prang in Python and https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/XML-LibXML/lib/XML/LibXML/RelaxNG.pod in Perl. The latter reuses existing Perl dependencies (libxml2), but I have no idea of the quality of that implementation (Jing is really the reference).
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
