On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 10:36:30PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> But some cases I’d like to point out:
>
> InsetMathSpace::doDispatch() calls createInsetMath_fromDialogStr()
> createInsetMath_fromDialogStr calls mathed_parse_cell()
> mathed_parse_cell() calls Parser() with NULL buffer
>
> Similar
Am 06.02.2020 um 19:10 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:37:43PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 06.02.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Wi
We have two pretty bad bugs in 2.3.4. One is
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11728
which causes a five-second delay whenever you try to save a file on
Windows. This one is my fault (and compounded by the fact that we get
little testing on that platform). The other is the bug in this thread
On 2/6/20 2:46 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:53:34PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 2/6/20 9:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:53:34PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 2/6/20 9:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimbe
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >This is what I initially thought, but no k+m+2 is still ok because we
> >check against < MAX_WD_LEN-1 not <= MAX_WD_LEN-1.
>
> I patched and recompiled, same warning as expected from the last posts.
Yes, the warning won't g
On 2/6/20 9:58 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
>>> I can repr
Le 06/02/2020 à 18:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:37:43PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.02.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Ki
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:16:00PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at
Am 06.02.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > I looked at the code an
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> > > reported
> > > lin
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> > reported
> > line (247) by the previous if clause.
> > What is not clear to me are two
When I hit Return key (MacOS 10.15.2), there is a slight delay before a
new paragraph is created. This is whith a rather complex document,
multiple children, a lot of cross-references, bibliography, etc.
I seem not to remember this delay before 2.3.4. Did anyone else notice?
If not, I could do
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> reported
> line (247) by the previous if clause.
> What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the
> check seem to properly handl
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> > >
> > > I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
> >
> > I can reproduce something similar with 2.4.0
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> reported
> line (247) by the previous if clause.
> What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the
> check seem to properly handl
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> >
> > I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
>
> I can reproduce something similar with 2.4.0 too. But I cannot reproduce with
> 2.2.4.
I can confirm it with Qt5 no
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:52:29PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 31/01/2020 ? 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> >Public release of LyX version 2.3.4
> >===
> >
> >We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth
> >maintenance re
20 matches
Mail list logo
