Am 06.02.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org>: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:15:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <rikih...@lyx.org>: >>>> >>>> I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one? >>> >>> I can reproduce something similar with 2.4.0 too. But I cannot reproduce >>> with 2.2.4. >> >> I can confirm it with Qt5 now. >> Bisect leads to: >> >> commit a2d181905a95b3bb983dac60f3d9603413a01f34 >> Author: Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> >> Date: Tue Jun 25 22:23:51 2019 +0200 >> >> Fix bug #11586 >> >> Do not replace a latex command with the corresponding symbol >> in the unicodesymbols file unless it can be encoded in the >> document encoding. > > That commit simply exposes the bug, which is the fact that the buffer > member is not initialized. I think the patch by Stephan is correct.
That leads me to the question if there are more occurrences of this problem. E.g. with 2.3.x in InsetMathMacro::attachArguments() the line d->expanded_ = MathData(); could be better d->expanded_ = MathData(d->definition_.buffer()); But in fact I don’t know if it is that simple pattern. Stephan -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
