On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 5:56 PM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:42:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Looks little bit difficult within the current machinery (if I understand
> > it correctly). Cits can be fixed by incremental runs and we see that in
> > updated result value of sca
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 11:43 AM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 07:50:55PM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Thanks for putting these together so quickly. Some comments:
> >
> >1. p1: The notation seems inconsistent, referring to both citations
> and
> >references. From what
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:42:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Looks little bit difficult within the current machinery (if I understand
> it correctly). Cits can be fixed by incremental runs and we see that in
> updated result value of scanres of LaTeX::run, i.e. if fixed it does not
> contain UNDE
Le 06/06/2019 à 22:42, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu
12.04 has been unsupported since 2017.
Pavel, would you care?
I'd like 4.9 to be still supported.
Belo
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu
> 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017.
>
> Pavel, would you care?
I'd like 4.9 to be still supported.
Below that I don't care.
Pavel
Hi JMarc,
> It seems that the thing to do is to keep track of visited directories, like
> here for example:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36977259/avoiding-infinite-recursion-with-os-walk
Good point. These will be my first lines of Python-code, but I’ll try. I tested
this with an artifi
Am 06.06.2019 um 16:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
>
> I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu
> 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017.
>
> Pavel, would you care?
>
> The next step is gcc 4.9, in order to get rid of boost regex. The oldest
> supported
Le 06/06/2019 à 16:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Yes. Did you also already try gcc9? This brings lots of new fun with
-Wdeprecated-copy all over the source.
Yes. Part of it is in Qt, we cannot do much about it. I have not looked
yet at the part that conerns us. My plan is to fix the relevan
Am Donnerstag, den 06.06.2019, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> Dear Jürgen,
>
> I see that compiling hunspell with recent compilers leads to
> annoying
> warnings about switches falling through. I see that as an incitation
> to
> upgrade to 1.7.0 :)
Yes. Did you also already try gc
I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since
ubuntu 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017.
Pavel, would you care?
The next step is gcc 4.9, in order to get rid of boost regex. The oldest
supported ubuntu LTS (16.04) has that.
We could even try to go all the way t
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 07:50:55PM -0600, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> Thanks for putting these together so quickly. Some comments:
>
>1. p1: The notation seems inconsistent, referring to both citations and
>references. From what I understand, I would refer strictly to citations
>(perhaps
Dear Jürgen,
I see that compiling hunspell with recent compilers leads to annoying
warnings about switches falling through. I see that as an incitation to
upgrade to 1.7.0 :)
Do you still remember how you did that for 1.6.2?
JMarc
On 2019-06-05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 05/06/2019 à 12:49, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
>> On Wednesday, 5 June 2019 10.55.11 WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I hope this change can be considered for inclusion in a future LyX
version.
Regards,
Michael
>> The problem wi
13 matches
Mail list logo
