To create \hat, we have a keybinding alt+m, h. I propose the following
bindings (patch attached):
- alt + m, H -> \widehat
- alt + m, t -> \tilde
- alt + m, T -> \widetilde
- alt + m, ~ -> \tilde
Any thoughts?
Scott
diff --git a/lib/bind/math.bind b/lib/bind/math.bind
index 783d5ca..b798
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:29:47PM +, Stephan Witt wrote:
> I don’t have tried any of the offered options. ATM I don’t have a problem
> to build 2.3.x. And on Mac I’ll stick to stable Qt 5.9 until Qt 5.12 is
> available if possible.
Makes sense. I'm still on 5.6 for my main computer. [The res
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2018 22:29:47 CEST schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Am 14.06.2018 um 19:56 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:05:08PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 14:52:43 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >> :
> It is possible, the commit d6
Am 14.06.2018 um 19:56 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:05:08PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 14:52:43 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>> :
It is possible, the commit d6b21e2 does exactly that. Does not raise the
minimal cmake version, in
Am 14.06.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2018, 21:43 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> I do think we should support Qt 5.11 on 2.3.x because 2.3.x will
>>> probably be around for a while.
>>
>> I’m not against support for Qt 5.11 but it will be around until 5.1
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 09:07:36PM +, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Once this is done, we should be ready to release the 2.3.0 installers.
Richard, with which Qt version are you planning to do the MinGW build
for the LyX 2.3.0 installers? Qt 5.9.6 was released this week [1]. But
since there
