Richard Heck wrote:
> On 07/15/2016 02:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the
> >> ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git
> >> bisect the only way to fix issues like this.
> > We know sympto
This is a test.
Am 15.07.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Richard Heck:
I don't have time to discuss this right now. But your addition of those
dependencies itself caused a regression: One of the packages you require
is not actually required on all systems, so users not on Windows were
getting an error about needing to in
On 07/15/2016 04:24 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> In bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10284 a conflict occurred:
>
> Some years a go we added the feature to add packages which are
> required by a module or layout file. This turned out to be a very
> valuable feature because:
> * the user gets a warning
In bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10284 a conflict occurred:
Some years a go we added the feature to add packages which are required
by a module or layout file. This turned out to be a very valuable
feature because:
* the user gets a warning if a required package is not installed
* MiKTeX
On 07/15/2016 02:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the
>> ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git
>> bisect the only way to fix issues like this.
> We know symptoms, not the cause. Until that ch
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the
> ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git
> bisect the only way to fix issues like this.
We know symptoms, not the cause. Until that changes 'fix' is improbable.
Pavel
Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2016 um 12:54:43, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 07/15/2016 12:51 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > commit 10f6eb2e7eeffc757b7f54059524441e90008240
> > Author: Guillaume Munch
> > Date: Fri Jul 15 17:45:47 2016 +0100
> >
> > LaTeX highlighter: make at a letter in the user pream
Suppose I configure and build LyX in a separate directory build/. Then,
to update stats, I have to run "make i18n.inc" from build/po/, since
that is where the Makefile is. But this fails:
cd ../../po ; /usr/bin/python postats.py "2.3.0dev" ../../po/ar.po
../../po/ca.po ../../po/cs.po ../../po/da.p
I have resuscitated the 2.2.2-staging branch (i.e., merge 2.2.x into
it). So, anyone I've told recently, "You can commit such-and-such to
2.2.x after the release of 2.2.1" is welcome to push to 2.2.2-staging,
if they wish to do so. You're also welcome just to wait, as earlier
suggested, if you wish
I propose to add a couple new styles to the enumitem module in master,
moslty to give users more of a sense for what it can do. We could
potentially also add another module, Extra Lists, or something, that
added even more.
This could also be added to the 2.2.x series, using the ForceLocal tag.
Th
On 07/15/2016 12:51 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> commit 10f6eb2e7eeffc757b7f54059524441e90008240
> Author: Guillaume Munch
> Date: Fri Jul 15 17:45:47 2016 +0100
>
> LaTeX highlighter: make at a letter in the user preamble
>
> Syntax highlighting now provides the appropriate cue tha
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:17:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> commit 8085899fb6dbea6ab842cba5dd40b079863a7e24
> Author: Pavel Sanda
> Date: Mon Jul 4 13:17:07 2016 -0700
>
> Ressurect make distcheck.
> ---
> lib/Makefile.am |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
On 07/14/2016 11:56 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 14/07/2016 07:13, Buenas Noticias a écrit :
Hi Michael:
TeXlive can work because each is in a different folder and you are
the one you
decide on your route which you work (/usr/local/texlive/2013 or 2016).
I think that if you have inst
14 matches
Mail list logo
