Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

2016-01-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.01.2016 um 03:39 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Give me another day to test but I think that I am basically ready for beta1. Sounds good to me. I tested it a lot today on different PCs and from my point of view it is stable. So I am ready for beta1. regards Uwe

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Georg Baum
Peter Kümmel wrote: > I also don't see a problem to build from a clean git repository. > Only thing I would ensure is to "sit" on tagged release. I agree that building from a clean git directory is not a problem concerning the resulting build or reproducibility. There is however one difference

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Georg Baum
Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: So I still think that creating a new git branch and copying the files from the tar there is the quickest and also safest way - no need to fiddle around with any path. Here I strongly disagree. By doing this,

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

2016-01-15 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 15/01/2016 20:50, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Is a step in Development.lyx missing? IIRC we did not decide that yet. IMHO it is not required to update these files for each format change, but some time ago we decided that for a release all files should be up to date, and it

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

2016-01-15 Thread Georg Baum
Guillaume Munch wrote: > Is a step in Development.lyx missing? IIRC we did not decide that yet. IMHO it is not required to update these files for each format change, but some time ago we decided that for a release all files should be up to date, and it is in the release checklist. Georg

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

2016-01-15 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 15/01/2016 20:32, Georg Baum a écrit : commit 4c3b8bf7c7205e26b28b6562be11105558ec3250 Author: Georg Baum Date: Fri Jan 15 21:31:57 2016 +0100 Update LFUNs.lyx to current format diff --git a/development/tools/gen_lfuns.py b/development/tools/gen_lfuns.py index 8e4bc88..0fb9380 100755

Re: beta release

2016-01-15 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Georg can you confirm that 5c2d0499 (and the amendment at 9267b2b2) is > all we need to do for 2.2.0 regarding #9841? Yes, this is fine now. I did also update the docs regarding the swapped \output_changes position using the experimental mode of updatedocs.py which work

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

2016-01-15 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 14/01/2016 20:13, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: We might be speaking of two different issues: * If I click on the right-hand half of the separator, the cursor moves after the separator both visually and logically (a position tha

Re: beta release

2016-01-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 08:12:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? > > The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker. > > Fortunately Guill

Re: FreeMono

2016-01-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 07:40:35AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> Things to improve in this context are > > >> * LyX runs XeTeX five times until realizing that there is a missing font. > >> (Error detection should improve) > > Shall I file a bug report? We compile the document as best as po

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Stephan Witt
> Am 15.01.2016 um 15:48 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > > > Am 15.01.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> Am 15.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Kümmel : >>> >>> Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: >> So I still think that creating a

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 15.01.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 15.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Kümmel : Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: So I still think that creating a new git branch and copying the files from the tar there is the quickest and also

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 15.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: >> So I still think that creating a new git branch and copying the files from the tar there is the quickest and also safest way - no need to fid

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 15.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > > > Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: >> So I still think that creating a new git branch and copying the files from the tar there is the quickest and also safest way - no need to >>

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

2016-01-15 Thread Peter Kümmel
Am 14.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 14.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Georg Baum: So I still think that creating a new git branch and copying the files from the tar there is the quickest and also safest way - no need to fiddle around with any path. Here I strongly disagree. By doing this

Re: FreeMono

2016-01-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2016 um 07:40:35, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-14, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am 14. Januar 2016 um 12:28:51, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-01-14, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Dear Kornel, > > >> (BTW: in the Document>Settings>Fonts GUI, I can see FreeSerif and > >> F