Le 20/12/2015 17:31, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Do you mean that you expect the parbreak separator to be used often on
purpose, instead of a plain separator, not just as the result of a
conversion 2.1 -> 2.2 ?
It is annoying repeating again all discussions made at the time those
insets were i
Le 06/01/2016 20:51, Georg Baum a écrit :
Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 03/01/2016 11:04, Georg Baum a écrit :
Really? The amount of code changes is big, and I cannot see from the
patch that it has no influence on the .tex input/output or mathml/xhtml
output. If it can not be 100% guaranteed that
Am 10.01.2016 um 22:21 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I hope your trip went OK.
Hi all,
a happy new year. I am just back so don't expect too much - I have also
a real life.
Do you have an idea of when you will be able to get
back to LyX development?
Tomorrow.
It would be nice to know so we
Le 10/01/2016 21:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 08/01/16 23:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and
\tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the
proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the
Le 10/01/16 22:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I imagine that Toc and other classes are being forward-declared in some
headers probably for the same speed reason. Toc.h is there to provide an
alternative to the forward declarations without sacrificing speed (or
maybe my Toc.h already includes too m
Le 10/01/2016 21:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure
myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I
think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am go
Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure
myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I
think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am going to keep it
for later.
Indeed Georg's comment lo
Le 10/01/2016 19:08, Georg Baum a écrit :
>
I looked at the patches in http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841, and I think
it is a good implementation of the consensus that has been reached earlier.
You have a +1 from me, but because this has been discussed with some strong
opinions I suggest that t
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 06:03:07PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 09.01.2016 um 01:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > >S1. Would it be reasonable to build beta1 installers with both Qt 5.5.1
> > >and 5.6.0beta1?
> >
>
Hi Uwe,
I hope your trip went OK. Do you have an idea of when you will be able to get
back to LyX development? It would be nice to know so we can get an idea of when
to release beta1. Since we know you are busy, we have aggregated most of our
questions for you into one email.
The following letter
Le 10/01/2016 20:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should
get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for
forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling
Le 08/01/16 23:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and
\tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the
proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the list.
The patch is very simple (see the earlier mess
Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should
get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for
forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling
about starting to define custom constructors for STL
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker.
Fortunately Guillaume implemented a proper solution, so the only thing which
is needed is th
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and
> \tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the
> proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the list.
> The patch is very simple (see the earlier message:
> http://a
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> So I can chmod +x all the scripts?
This cannot harm, so +1 from me (for every script in development/tools/).
Georg
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>
>> I am fine with this and you have a +1 from me. However, note that the
>> origin handling is currently broken. Indeed, allowing to save the
>> document directory in the preferences, after creating a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>>> Yes, unless somone has a different brilliant idea.
>
>>> This problem will go away in 2.3.
>>
>> How? With your fix? Does it fix wrong LyX code or is it some work
Le 09/01/16 23:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I do not understand it. I'm fine as long as another developer gives an
explicit +1.
I see it is in now. It is fine for me.
JMarc
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 15:02:14, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 14:27:46, schrieb Stephan Witt
> > Am 08.01.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> > >
> > > Le 08/01/2016 10:08, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> > >> Am 08.01.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
20 matches
Mail list logo
