Guillaume Munch wrote: > I agree that the current situation regarding \output_change and > \tracking_change is bad and should be fixed. I gave what I think is the > proper solution, taking into account the debate that was on the list. > The patch is very simple (see the earlier message: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/159493 and: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841). Now what we would need for such a > change is if developers who took part in the discussion looked and say: > yes, this is the proper solution. I do not see this happening right now.
I guess because of the mailing list outage the mail has been forgotten. I looked at the patches in http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841, and I think it is a good implementation of the consensus that has been reached earlier. You have a +1 from me, but because this has been discussed with some strong opinions I suggest that there should be more reviews. > Then, what is a proper solution? You want a file format increase + > lyx2lyx + tex2lyx changes? I am more familiar with format increase now > so it's easier for me, although: 1) please not while I have another > format change pending because these things do not rebase very well, and > 2) I will need help for tex2lyx. Another solution is to revert as I have > suggested. You don't need to do anything in tex2lyx besides writing the new parameter with a default value as you did in the patch. Georg
