Will LyX 2.2 fix the OS X slow scrolling problem?

2015-06-02 Thread Jerry
Will LyX 2.2 fix the OS X slow scrolling problem? Someone mentioned some time back that there is an experimental fix for the slow scrolling problem on OS X LyX but that it needs testing. I am willing to test. However, even further back while testing for another problem, I experienced difficulty

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:03:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > > I did the test, I wrote the following in the preamble: > > \PassOptionsToPackage{draft}{microtype} > \usepackage[protrusion=true,expansion=true,tracking=true,kerning=true,spacing=true]{microtype} > > and managed to compile in pos

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Guillaume M-M
Le 02/06/2015 23:56, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:47:45PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: Le 02/06/2015 23:38, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:04:20AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:07:11PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:47:45PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > Le 02/06/2015 23:38, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:04:20AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:07:11PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > >> > >>>By the way, a safer way to force not

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:19:56AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > Le 01/06/2015 23:04, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >>You may be right that microtype may have been the reason why I had the > >>impression that latex is slower than pdflatex, but this does not account for > >>the 55s (on a good comput

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Guillaume M-M
Le 02/06/2015 23:38, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:04:20AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:07:11PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: By the way, a safer way to force not loading a package is to prepend \usepackage with "\@namedef{v...@microtype.sty

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:04:20AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:07:11PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > > > By the way, a safer way to force not loading a package is to prepend > > \usepackage with "\@namedef{v...@microtype.sty}{/12/31}". If you just > > strip the

Re: test of math previews (was: [LyX/master] Really fix bug #9354)

2015-06-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-01 19:34 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri : > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:50:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 07:26:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > > > > > > > > 1) b3d2ffc0 introduces

Re: consider tex2lyx + tests locked in master

2015-06-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2015 um 22:10:54, schrieb Georg Baum > >> Georg Baum wrote: >> >> > Please do not submit anything in tex2lyx source code and tests for ca. two >> > days (I'll send a message when the lock is over). >> >> Sorry, I forgot t

Re: consider tex2lyx + tests locked in master

2015-06-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2015 um 22:10:54, schrieb Georg Baum > Georg Baum wrote: > > > Please do not submit anything in tex2lyx source code and tests for ca. two > > days (I'll send a message when the lock is over). > > Sorry, I forgot to tell that yesterday: I am now finished. > > > Georg OK,

Re: consider tex2lyx + tests locked in master

2015-06-02 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: > Please do not submit anything in tex2lyx source code and tests for ca. two > days (I'll send a message when the lock is over). Sorry, I forgot to tell that yesterday: I am now finished. Georg

Re: Merging features/fix-tex2lyx-tests to master

2015-06-02 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 31.05.2015 um 19:06 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >>> This might be a tex2lyx bug as well, depending how the reference was >>> created. This is not in 1) since I can reproduce the results in 1) with >>> current tex2lyx but not this one. Uwe, how did you create the reference >>> which

Re: how recent may a required feature be?

2015-06-02 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/02/2015 01:21 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 02/06/2015 18:35, Guenter Milde a écrit : Dear LyX developers, I am planning to improve/fix the "textgreek" feature of the Unicode -> LaTeX export. The current implementation of “textgreek” makes LyX insert “\DeclareTextSymbol{\~}{LGR}{126

Re: how recent may a required feature be?

2015-06-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/06/2015 18:35, Guenter Milde a écrit : Dear LyX developers, I am planning to improve/fix the "textgreek" feature of the Unicode -> LaTeX export. The current implementation of “textgreek” makes LyX insert “\DeclareTextSymbol{\~}{LGR}{126}” into the LaTeX preamble. This was a workaround fo

how recent may a required feature be?

2015-06-02 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear LyX developers, I am planning to improve/fix the "textgreek" feature of the Unicode -> LaTeX export. The current implementation of “textgreek” makes LyX insert “\DeclareTextSymbol{\~}{LGR}{126}” into the LaTeX preamble. This was a workaround for missing accent definitions in LGR before th

Re: configure.py questions

2015-06-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2015-06-01 23:24 GMT+02:00 Uwe Stöhr : > While we are at it: during my research I read several times that the > program "Pandoc" produces nice results for TeX documents and that it can > handle BibTeX. So maybe we should add support for Pandoc to configure.py. > > If you agree I open an enhancemen

Re: configure.py questions

2015-06-02 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/02/2015 10:51 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: While we are at it: during my research I read several times that the program "Pandoc" produces nice results for TeX documents and that it can handle BibTeX. So maybe we should add support for Pandoc

Re: configure.py questions

2015-06-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > While we are at it: during my research I read several times that the program > "Pandoc" produces nice results for TeX documents and that it can handle > BibTeX. So maybe we should add support for Pandoc to configure.py. > > If you agree I open an

Re: test of math previews

2015-06-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2015-06-02 3:19 GMT+02:00 Guillaume M-M : > I think this was already addressed by Jürgen at 83a9ed4e. > >> >> > For me the bug is still here at cb201027. Try again my file > lyx-bug-renewcommandx.lyx attached to my first message. > Cannot reproduce. Jürgen