If you start a new document and do alt + p and type "address", the
combo box is not tall enough to display all of the results (so a
scrollbox is displayed). Similarly if you type "paragraph". I can
provide screenshots if others are unable to reproduce.
The attached patch fixes the above problem bu
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 16/07/14 20:41, Marcelo Galvão Póvoa a écrit :
>
>>> * adding a fake variable to lyxrc is bad :)
>>
>>
>> Is there a better alternative? The variable can be made customizable
>> like the others but I don't know if it makes sense.
>
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2014 um 12:08:21, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
> > 17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >> Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is
> >> someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is
>> someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is good because it is a
>> strong signal of how to fix the problem. But if it is s
17/07/2014 17:55, Scott Kostyshak:
Yes I like "none compiled in" but have mixed feelings. If it is
someone who compiled LyX themselves, then it is good because it is a
strong signal of how to fix the problem. But if it is someone using a
package on their distro compiled by the packager then maybe
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 17/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>>> Maybe the list that allows to choose the spellchecker could read "none
>>> available"?
>>
>>
>> I wanted to come up with something that would signal to the user that
>> it is a build issue and
17/07/2014 17:51, Scott Kostyshak:
Do you mean that cmake does not enable them by default? This is bad, IMO.
The configure script configure whatever spellcheckers it finds, and it is
possible to disable them individually.
I did mean that but I was mistaken (I saw the - LYX_HUNSPELL = OFF
report
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 17/07/2014 16:57, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Fabio Fiorelli wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone
>>> I'm having a problem with the spell-checker. I'm running a computer with
>>> CentOS 6.5 installed, and I instal
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 17.07.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
>> 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak:
>>> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields
>>> are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it
>>
17/07/2014 17:35, Scott Kostyshak:
Maybe the list that allows to choose the spellchecker could read "none
available"?
I wanted to come up with something that would signal to the user that
it is a build issue and not a "can't find hunspell" issue (i.e. it's a
"didn't tell me to look for hunspell
17/07/2014 16:57, Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Fabio Fiorelli wrote:
Hello everyone
I'm having a problem with the spell-checker. I'm running a computer with
CentOS 6.5 installed, and I installed Lyx 2.1. However when I go in the
settings, the spell-checker option is greyed
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields
>> are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it
>> be more or less confusing to have a message explai
Am 17.07.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> 17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak:
>> If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields
>> are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it
>> be more or less confusing to have a message explaining that
17/07/2014 17:01, Scott Kostyshak:
If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields
are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it
be more or less confusing to have a message explaining that LyX needs
to have the option set at compile time?
What kind of
If LyX is not built explicitly enabling a spellchecker, some fields
are greyed out. This comes up from time to time on the list. Would it
be more or less confusing to have a message explaining that LyX needs
to have the option set at compile time?
Scott
15 matches
Mail list logo
