Am 22.03.2014 um 16:46 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> Stephan Witt schreef op 22-3-2014 15:55:
>> Shouldn't LyX/2.2-staging branch get version 2.2.0dev?
>>
>> Stephan
> I don't think so. When 2.1 is released, the master branch will become
> 2.2.0dev. The commits that are now in 2.2-staging a
Am 24.03.2014 um 04:46 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> Uwe StĂśhr wrote:
>> commit 085b0e6fd1ad316793ad8f4f96cf69a17c667d2d
>> Author: Uwe Stöhr
>> Date: Sun Mar 23 14:49:57 2014 +0100
>>
>>PrefCompletionUi.ui: port commit 1a137950
>>
>> diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/ui/PrefCompletionUi.ui
>> b
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:46:15PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Uwe StĂśhr wrote:
> > commit 085b0e6fd1ad316793ad8f4f96cf69a17c667d2d
> > Author: Uwe Stöhr
> > Date: Sun Mar 23 14:49:57 2014 +0100
> >
> > PrefCompletionUi.ui: port commit 1a137950
> >
> > diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/ui/P
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Also adding few lines in RELEASE-NOTES about how we are doing with Qt5 would
> be
> worth for maintainers of lyx binaries in various linux distros.
> Anyone running it with Qt5 nowadays?
I've been testing LyX 2.1git for a few months now wit
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> 2. Under Look & Feel->Document Handling one can decide if the document is
> closed or hidden when its
> tab or view is closed. What is the benefit of hiding the document?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/142638
Pavel
Uwe StĂśhr wrote:
> commit 085b0e6fd1ad316793ad8f4f96cf69a17c667d2d
> Author: Uwe Stöhr
> Date: Sun Mar 23 14:49:57 2014 +0100
>
> PrefCompletionUi.ui: port commit 1a137950
>
> diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/ui/PrefCompletionUi.ui
> b/src/frontends/qt4/ui/PrefCompletionUi.ui
> index 010b3
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Forget it, I saw the bug number meanwhile in next commits.
> Just the description in this commit confused me, srry.
My fault. I forgot to reference the bug number.
Scott
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> For me in Ubuntu 13.10 with Qt 5, without the patch (but with
> Juergen's patch), if I right click on an element in the Outliner and
> click on "select section" and press "backspace", nothing happens. With
> the patch, if I do the same thing, the section is deleted (which i
Richard Heck wrote:
> I have created a new branch, 2.1.1-staging. Anything that is committed to
> 2.2-staging that would be appropriate for 2.1.1 should also go to this
> branch. Mostly, that will mean anything that is also going to 2.0.8, but
> there may be some 2.1.x-only fixes that should go
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> commit 87e2af90ec51ebed875e81d8d9f8691a629298ef
>> Author: Scott Kostyshak
>> Date: Fri Mar 21 19:34:46 2014 -0400
>>
>> Focus on buffer after section select in Outliner
>>
> I don't see this problem in 2.1. At
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> commit 87e2af90ec51ebed875e81d8d9f8691a629298ef
> Author: Scott Kostyshak
> Date: Fri Mar 21 19:34:46 2014 -0400
>
> Focus on buffer after section select in Outliner
>
> diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp b/src/frontends/qt4/TocWidget.cpp
> index 2069035.
I am currently updating the documentation of the LyX preferences and have 2
questions:
1. Under Language Settings->Language there is now a default length unit. What
is this used for?
2. Under Look & Feel->Document Handling one can decide if the document is
closed or hidden when its
tab or vie
Am 22.03.2014 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Shouldn't LyX/2.2-staging branch get version 2.2.0dev?
Stephan
I don't think so. When 2.1 is released, the master branch will become 2.2.0dev.
The commits that are
now in 2.2-staging are merely waiting to get into master until then.
Just m
Am 23.03.2014 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 23-3-2014 15:11:
commit de5c90baa021f89b94fbe1dea836334d59d242e6
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Sun Mar 23 15:11:33 2014 +0100
ja.po: update by Koji
I guess you want those translations also in LyX 2.1 ?
Sure but mast
On 03/23/2014 03:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
The obvious comment is of course: Is it really necessary to have these
static variables, or was it just laziness of the programmer ? I don't
want to introduce QThreadStorage all over the place if it is not
really really the only solutions.
On 03/23/2014 03:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard Heck schreef op 23-3-2014 3:14:
Here is a new version of my idea for how to protect static variables
from thread problems.
The first patch introduces a template based on QThreadStorage which
acts kind of like a pointer. The secon
Am 23.03.2014 10:18, schrieb Stephan Witt:
It's correct to leave user preferences intact on software uninstall.
If a change in utility software installation is a common scenario
the user should be able to solve it by LyX's "Reconfigure", IMHO.
But this is then not possible. For example th use
Richard Heck schreef op 23-3-2014 3:14:
Here is a new version of my idea for how to protect static variables
from thread problems.
The first patch introduces a template based on QThreadStorage which
acts kind of like a pointer. The second patch uses the first one to
protect some static vari
Le 23/03/14 02:28, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
OK, now the user wants to use LyX again
because he remembered it or because he heard that there is a new version
with new features hew might like t try out. If you then use the old
preferences file you will destroy the new one built by the installer. So
e.g.
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 23-3-2014 15:11:
commit de5c90baa021f89b94fbe1dea836334d59d242e6
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Sun Mar 23 15:11:33 2014 +0100
ja.po: update by Koji
I guess you want those translations also in LyX 2.1 ?
Vincent
Am 22.03.2014 um 22:27 schrieb Richard Heck :
> On 03/22/2014 10:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 22.03.2014 um 14:08 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski :
>>
>> Yes, and it's done on Mac OS X this way. The first configure run with an
>> fresh user preferences directory (no preferences present al
Am 23.03.2014 um 02:28 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 22.03.2014 15:19, schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
>> This must be some misunderstanding. We are talking about user preferences.
>> The preferences of your colleague are living in a complete "parallel
>> universe".
>> You shouldn't have any access to them.
22 matches
Mail list logo
