Richard Heck wrote: > I have created a new branch, 2.1.1-staging. Anything that is committed to > 2.2-staging that would be appropriate for 2.1.1 should also go to this > branch. Mostly, that will mean anything that is also going to 2.0.8, but > there may be some 2.1.x-only fixes that should go there as well. > > As far as trac goes, if you commit to 2.1.1-staging AND 2.0.x, then set the > milestone to 2.0.8. If only to 2.1.1-staging, set it to 2.1.1.
Right, this 2.1.1 idea goes for a while. But - do all people around really think that (possibly) introduced bugs are better to happen in 2.1.1 than 2.1.0? It looks absurd to me - can't we merge this stuff after RC1? Pavel
