Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/15/2014 10:29 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 15/03/14 23:52, Roy Xia wrote: Roy, did you try a couple of changes and double-checked they're correctly saved in prefs, both in the case of new shortcut, and in the one of reassignment? Yeah, changing shortcuts through the overriding dialog a

Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 15/03/14 23:52, Roy Xia wrote: > Roy, did you try a couple of changes and double-checked they're > correctly saved in prefs, both in the case of new shortcut, and in > the one of reassignment? > > Yeah, changing shortcuts through the overriding dialog and then > saving them persists across LyX

Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Roy Xia
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Also, is the ->accept() call that causes the change to become permanent on > disk, or what ? > As Richard said, the accept() call seems only to close the dialog where you input your shortcut. Moving it to after the overriding logic keep

Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/15/2014 07:29 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 03/15/2014 06:59 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 15/03/14 19:38, Richard Heck wrote: Can someone give an OK for this patch from Roy Xia? It seems to work just fine. I'm not sure "Overwrite shortcut" is the best way to ask this to the user. What a

Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/15/2014 06:59 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: On 15/03/14 19:38, Richard Heck wrote: Can someone give an OK for this patch from Roy Xia? It seems to work just fine. I'm not sure "Overwrite shortcut" is the best way to ask this to the user. What about: - "Override shortcut" - "Redefine shortc

Re: Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 15/03/14 19:38, Richard Heck wrote: > > Can someone give an OK for this patch from Roy Xia? It seems to work just fine. I'm not sure "Overwrite shortcut" is the best way to ask this to the user. What about: - "Override shortcut" - "Redefine shortcut" - "Reassociate shortcut" - "Change shortcut

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 15/03/14 19:56, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > In Qt, it should be fairly easy to intercept key presses from the > main application events loop, then if the focus is on a specific > dialog, one might try to route the event straight there? or perhaps just install an event filter? T.

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 15/03/14 17:09, Richard Heck wrote: > So I think making this widget a standalone > dialog is probably not what most people are going to want to do. Correct, we definitely don't want to make Advanced Find & Replace a simple dialog. Rather, I heard several times people would like to turn the Simp

Patch Confirmation [Re: Patch for Ticket #8939]

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
Can someone give an OK for this patch from Roy Xia? Richard >From b508286290193152cadfa3a7d9f340fe13eab01e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:36:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix for bug #8939: Don't just close if the user enters a shortcut that is already ass

Re: GSoC: Overhauling LyX's converter scheme

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/11/2014 02:40 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/03/2014 10:10, Roy Xia a écrit : Hi everyone, Hello, I suppose my first question to you all is whether there are any alternative suggestions or additional goals out there for overhauling the converter scheme. To be frank I am not su

Re: 2.1beta2: cannot save as ....

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/14/2014 11:09 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Been beating on 2.1b2 for some time and now 1st bug. Started a new file. Then tried to save as. Select a directory to browse, then enter a file name. When I try to save I got a message about 'cannot save file...' But the file was saved fine. I tho

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/15/2014 12:34 PM, Ankit Shah wrote: I think doing so would be easy if we can convert it like the normal find and replace window. This would also allow for extra space available to user to view the document. Note that the dialog can be undocked, at least here on Linux. Just grab and

Re: [GSOC 2014] - Implement 3-box drawing of insets

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/14/2014 04:37 PM, Mitul Modi wrote: Thank you for your detailed reply. I tested with Lyx Documentation and as you said it crashed. I will solve that problem. The crash is from: diff --git a/src/insets/InsetText.cpp b/src/insets/InsetText.cpp index 94ea92c..7158074 100644 --- a/src/inset

test

2014-03-15 Thread Long Wu
Best regards, Wu Long

empty

2014-03-15 Thread Long Wu
Best regards, Wu Long

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Ankit Shah
I think doing so would be easy if we can convert it like the normal find and replace window. This would also allow for extra space available to user to view the document. Also another idea we can handle transparency of find and replace window on loose focus. Never tried anything like that in Qt but

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/15/2014 05:52 AM, Ankit Shah wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > wrote: 2014-03-13 14:32 GMT+01:00 Ankit Shah: I'm new to LyX source code. I want to work on the bug ticket #9008 . I'

Re: [PATCH] Bump RC format for commit 214f7ed2

2014-03-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 03/14/2014 04:19 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I've never done this before. Is this correct? Am I right that prefs2prefs is optional when adding a new preference? If it's a new preference, then no substantive code is needed. But the format should be bumped. Note that something needs to be adde

Lyx git link

2014-03-15 Thread Kamal Garg
last time when i was participated in Gsoc 2013 then i have faced the same problem mentor of lyx 2013:stefano franch provided me a new link for downloading of lyx.But now i have lost that link plz provide me that link

Git Problem

2014-03-15 Thread Kamal Garg
> > Sir,i am using ubuntu 13.04 in the terminal when i run this command:git > clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx > Give me this error > Cloning into 'lyx'... > fatal: unable to connect to git.lyx.org: > git.lyx.org: System error > Sir,when i run this command:git clone http://git.lyx.org/lyx then give me

Re: About Source code download

2014-03-15 Thread Prannoy Pilligundla
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Garg wrote: > Sir,i am using ubuntu 13.04 in the terminal when i run this command:git > clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx > Give me this error > Cloning into 'lyx'... > fatal: unable to connect to git.lyx.org: > git.lyx.org: System error > I am not sure why you a

Python path

2014-03-15 Thread Benjamin Piwowarski
Hi, This is related to bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8950  The problem is the following. Currently, to find python2, LyX: - checks the python command is a valid python 2 executable - if so, it just stores that the python command is “python” (otherwise, it searches and uses an absolute path

Re: About Source code download

2014-03-15 Thread Prannoy Pilligundla
Hi Kamal, Can you please elaborate more on what kind of problem you are facing? If you have git installed then you can run "git clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx" from within the directory where you initially wanted your download to be. Thanks and Regards Prannoy Pilligundla ᐧ On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 a

About Source code download

2014-03-15 Thread Kamal Garg
sir, i am not able to download the source code from the provided link on the lyx site.can you provide me a download link for source code.

Re: Bug Ticket 9008

2014-03-15 Thread Ankit Shah
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-03-13 14:32 GMT+01:00 Ankit Shah: > > I'm new to LyX source code. I want to work on the bug ticket > #9008. >> I'm good at C,C++. Can anyone please explain me the bug. I'm not able to >> replic

Re: splash.lyx translation (Korean)

2014-03-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 14. März 2014 um 16:19:14, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> (1) we can just move towards enabling all tests and then > > > >> inverting/ignoring when we need to. The only disadvantage is computer > > > >> time. > > > >> (2) we can have a file that will force the inclusion of a specific te