On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak schreef op 6-12-2013 18:23:
>> When looking at other's commits regarding the LyX documents, it is
>> difficult for me to understand what was changed by lyx2lyx and what
>> was added by the commiter. Thus, I'm proposi
Thank you,
I found that this strange behaviour is due to the viruses (malwares).
Now after struggling to remove them, I can reinstall lyx, It can run as
usual.
I have to be extra careful with this box running windows.
regards,
waluyo
On 10 December 2013 15:05, Hugo Hinterberger wrote:
> On Mon
11/12/2013 17:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
I cannot put them there because i don't have write access, but you
have. So if you give me access, I will put them there directly, also
the test installers.
Obtaining access is not so easy, and probably even impossible on
Windows, so that is not an opti
Scott Kostyshak schreef op 6-12-2013 18:23:
> When looking at other's commits regarding the LyX documents, it is
> difficult for me to understand what was changed by lyx2lyx and what
> was added by the commiter. Thus, I'm proposing that one commit does
> only the lyx2lyx and the following commit ma
Uwe Stöhr schreef op 10-12-2013 23:30:
Am 04.12.2013 20:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Yes, but what is the problem with having them on SF? This way the
dictionaries are mirrored
automatically and that as the reason put them there.
Of course, you'll have arguments for everything, but th
