On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: > Scott Kostyshak schreef op 6-12-2013 18:23: >> When looking at other's commits regarding the LyX documents, it is >> difficult for me to understand what was changed by lyx2lyx and what >> was added by the commiter. Thus, I'm proposing that one commit does >> only the lyx2lyx and the following commit makes the substantial >> changes. See the following two commits: >> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/84c12ab6/lyxgit >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/033b49df/lyxgit >> >> I'm not proposing that this be a strict rule for anyone committing >> changes to the docs. I'm just curious on whether anyone advises in >> favor of/against or is indifferent. >> >> Scott > > Yes, it would indeed be good to split the commits. However, I'm not fond > of the phrase "Prepare for next commit". Just say what you did and it is > fine: "***.lyx: Update lyx format" would be enough IMO.
Makes sense. I guess it will be clear that I'm doing it for a future commit so it would be wasted time of people reading the extra line in the message. Scott
