Hi,
Did anybody had time to review this patch? It's quite simple: 3 added lines.
Would it be more helpful if I file a bug report in the trac? I've sent the
patch directly to the mailing list per the instructions in the development
FAQ.
Thanks,
Guy
http://www.guyrutenberg.com
On Fri, No
Hi JMarc,
Can you check my patch in the Bug Tracker
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8414 and check my changes in?
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/10/2012 19:32, Kayvan Sylvan a écrit :
>
> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm trying to see if I can stop using literat
Am 26.11.2012 23:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
But there is a case I still cannot handle:
for sigplanconf I have this command
\category{CR-number}{subcategory}{third-level}[additional description]
...
It gets even worse.
Consecutive categories must also appear in LaTeX consecutively:
-
Am 26.11.2012 15:53, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Thank you, I'll give it a try the next days.
I couldn't resist and I can report that it works fine.
But there is a case I still cannot handle:
for sigplanconf I have this command
\category{CR-number}{subcategory}{third-level}[additional description]
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I tried the recipe for biber under LyX and do get the references in the
> text but not in the References in the pdf output (Koma book style) (I had,
> though, to take out the backreferences in the PDF output, since it is not
> compatible with biber/biblatex (by princi
Le 26/11/2012 15:18, Alessandro Di Federico a écrit :
I just wanted to find the best period for most people, then we can
discuss the specific day. Let's see what comes out.
Remember that the user conference will not be during weekend, I can
schedule it on Monday or Thursday, but Friday already be
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> But isn't
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/e0f392e075e8e99732f4e2966700158185b5fb95/l
> yxgit
>
> a fileformat change?
No. Not even a layout format change proper, since nothing needs to be
converted and the new tags will be simply ignored by olde versions.
Jürgen
Am 26.11.2012 09:14, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Argument 1
Mandatory 1
LabelString "Company name"
Tooltip "company name"
Font
Series Bold
Shape
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:00 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I filled the doodle in a very conservative way, because my constraints
> are related to particular week-ends with some family constraints. If
> we had a week-end granularity I would probably have added more
> checkboxes.
I just wante
Le 23/11/2012 10:48, Alessandro Di Federico a écrit :
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:06 -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
No way I can get to Italy in April, as attractive as the prospect
sounds.
Actually it's still quite early so I can most probably move the user
conference. However the sooner we can fix
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We should probably forget about it. What we need is maybe a way to have
> default construction of insets, like saying that, at creation a Chunk
> inset contains already the <<>> stuff. Or that a figure float starts
> centered with a caption. Or that a table is bette
Le 26/11/2012 08:12, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can we use '\n' or some other linebreak character in RightDelim?
No. We could implement some placeholder that translates into a linebreak, but
I'm starting to feel we extend the layout syntax too much for the sake of this
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> But this would look ugly. For example when I have
>
> LabelString "Left item summary"
>
> Its size is OK for the insert menu entry, but for the label of the
> collapsible, this would make some documents quite unreadable. (in my
> particular case a command has 4 man
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> - Some commands output the arguments in a different font style, especially
> mandatory arguments. For example for modernCV I would need this:
>
> Style Recipient
> LatexType Command
> LatexName recipient
> Argument 1
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
