InsetArguments Question

2012-11-23 Thread Richard Heck
Jurgen, For the lyx2lyx conversion: Would it be possible for us to convert the arguments we know about to the new format? E.g., if it's a short title, and we know it is? I suspect this could be done for all of "our" insets that take arguments, and would be happy to do the work. Richard

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Dear all > > > > I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and > > I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with > > polishing, testing and finishing up the feature. > > Meanwhile, I have

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

2012-11-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Alessandro Di Federico wrote: > How many people were at the last LyX dev meeting? http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXMeetings Pavel

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Would it be safe to use the latter and strip this off for the button? Answering myself: yes it is. I've done that. Jürgen

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > - there is a typo in the example for Requires (in the documentation), > the second argument should be [arg] Thanks. I'll correct that. > - Why is the shortcut separate from the LabelString? Can't you just use > the & notation? This seems easier for translators. Ac

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/11/2012 16:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I think it is a good idea to commit it so that everybody could actually see/use it. Done. Hope you like it. It looks good. Two remarks - there is a typo in the example for Requires (in the documentation), the seco

Re: [LyX master] Show status of branches even when inset is closed

2012-11-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 21/11/2012 14:23, Richard Heck a écrit : On 11/20/2012 05:44 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 20/11/2012 23:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit 7ec2721d188edb777e4a64ae6005ca1d9d77f77a Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Tue Nov 20 23:38:38 2012 +0100 Show status of branches

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think it is a good idea to commit it so that everybody could actually > see/use it. Done. Hope you like it. Jürgen

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/11/2012 14:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Dear all I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with polishing, testing and finishing up the feature. Meanwhile, I hav

Re: [RFH] major InsetArgument revision

2012-11-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Dear all > > I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and > I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with > polishing, testing and finishing up the feature. Meanwhile, I have reached a state where I would like to merg

Re: LyX developer meeting or not ?

2012-11-23 Thread Alessandro Di Federico
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:06 -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > No way I can get to Italy in April, as attractive as the prospect > sounds. Actually it's still quite early so I can most probably move the user conference. However the sooner we can fix a date, the better. I've set up a Doodle: http://