Pietro Cortese wrote:
> For example with the code below I'm not able to insert the optional
> argument that should then be transformed into the hypertarget argument.
InsetLayout does not support optional arguments yet. I have some work towards
this in the pipe (for 2.1).
Jürgen
Am 11.11.2012 16:50, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
It looks better now indeed.
Thanks for giving it a try.
One thing I noticed is that the antivirus software gives the following warning
when uninstalling:
"uninstall-lyx.exe tries to add a value to a secured registry entry:
\REGISTRY\MACH
Am 08.11.2012 01:00, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
This is the installer that I already wanted to get official for LyX 2.0.4. But
I used the meantime
to iron out some issues users reported to me.
During the last days I fixed many small bugs in the installer and also revised the dictionary
handling, the
On 11/12/2012 03:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Mon Nov 12 17:27:13 2012
New Revision: 40948
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/40948
Log:
Release of 2.0.5.
Added:
www-user/trunk/announce/2_0_5.txt
Modified:
www-user/trunk/farm/cookbook/LyX/new
rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Mon Nov 12 17:27:13 2012
> New Revision: 40948
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/40948
>
> Log:
> Release of 2.0.5.
>
> Added:
>www-user/trunk/announce/2_0_5.txt
> Modified:
>www-user/trunk/farm/cookbook/LyX/news.inc
RSS feeds? p
On 11/12/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/12/2012 02:36 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 12-11-2012 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef:
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x s
On 11/12/2012 02:36 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 12-11-2012 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef:
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
Why is the Windows release a rar f
Op 12-11-2012 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef:
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
Why is the Windows release a rar file ?
Vincent
Something went awfully wrong there ..
Op 12-11-2012 17:26, rgheck schreef:
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
Why is the Windows release a rar file ?
Vincent
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.5. This is the fifth
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
LyX 2.0.5 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version
even more reliable and stable. We have fixed a number of bugs and made
a number of improvements. These are detail
On 11/11/2012 08:24 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I started using LyX at about LyX 1.3--LyX 1.4. In following the lists
since then I don't recall seeing any mention about the possibility of
exploiting the fact that a(n uncompressed) LyX file is a *text* file
and hence can be read and manipulated in
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 08:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> Has there been any discussion on LyX's handling of having a child and
>> more than one of its parents open at the same time since this email?
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.
On 11/12/2012 08:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Has there been any discussion on LyX's handling of having a child and
more than one of its parents open at the same time since this email?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123979
Not as far as I know. It's a complex issue.
Should
Has there been any discussion on LyX's handling of having a child and
more than one of its parents open at the same time since this email?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123979
Should I put a "Note that a child and two masters should not be open
at the same time" in the Embedded
Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 12:37:53, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > It still does not compile on ubuntu without
>
> What is strange it that I saw this error as well, but when I reconfigured it
> disappeared.
> Does it happen when you compile from clean tree? (Just curiosity,
Kornel Benko wrote:
> It still does not compile on ubuntu without
What is strange it that I saw this error as well, but when I reconfigured it
disappeared.
Does it happen when you compile from clean tree? (Just curiosity, when can push
the headers back.)
Pavel
Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 12:12:33, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> commit cabf8e86b53009abade633992df5d5a96dc3a42c
> Author: Enrico Forestieri
> Date: Mon Nov 12 12:11:42 2012 +0100
>
> Make it compile again on systems that don't USE_WCHAR_T
>
> diff --git a/src/support/docstring.cpp
Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 11:22:24, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 03:05:41, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> > The branch, master, has been updated.
> >
> > - Log -
> >
> > commit d692d6f27e7b440a582c8bc524eb875
Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 03:05:41, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> The branch, master, has been updated.
>
> - Log -
>
> commit d692d6f27e7b440a582c8bc524eb8755634fc568
> Author: Pavel Sanda
> Date: Mon Nov 12 03:05:30 2012 +0100
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
