Hi Stephan,
On 27/10/2012 20:56, Stephan Witt wrote:
This invalidates all patches hanging around for cosmetic reasons. Is
this really necessary? Stephan
Coding style and consistency is always worth it IMO. Solving merge
issues because of those are often easy. But this was a very valid
questi
Hi Lars,
I didn't read in detail but I think this patch is good.
Thanks,
Abdel
Yes. This fixes it. Thanks.
diff --git a/src/insets/InsetLine.cpp b/src/insets/InsetLine.cpp
index f72fe64..d933382 100644
--- a/src/insets/InsetLine.cpp
+++ b/src/insets/InsetLine.cpp
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include "support/docstream.h"
#include "support/gettext.h"
#include "support/lstrings.h"
+#
On 10/27/2012 03:02 PM, Hendrik Weisser wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I've happened across a bug in LyX 2.0.0 on Ubuntu 11.04.
If the "article (paper)" document class is used with the "titlepage"
class option, there's an interaction between the "author" and
"institution" environments. "author"
On 27 October 2012 21:31, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 27.10.2012 um 21:12 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes :
>
>>> This invalidates all patches hanging around for cosmetic reasons.
>>> Is this really necessary?
>>
>> Why do you have patches hanging around?
>
> Because I didn't apply them?
Commit them to
Am 27.10.2012 um 21:12 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes :
>> This invalidates all patches hanging around for cosmetic reasons.
>> Is this really necessary?
>
> Why do you have patches hanging around?
Because I didn't apply them?
> Are you saying that changes are hostage to undisclosed patches that
>
Stephan Witt writes:
| Am 27.10.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes :
>
>> ---
>> src/AppleSpellChecker.cpp | 6 +-
>> src/AspellChecker.cpp | 32 +++--
>> src/Author.cpp| 13 +-
>> src/BiblioInfo.cpp| 233 +-
>> src/Bidi.cpp
Kayvan Sylvan writes:
| On Fedora 16:
>
| CXXInsetListings.o
| insets/InsetLine.cpp: In member function 'virtual void
| lyx::InsetLine::metrics(lyx::MetricsInfo&, lyx::Dimension&) const':
| insets/InsetLine.cpp:121:33: error: 'abs' was not declared in this scope
On F16, that is actually surp
Dear LyX developers,
I've happened across a bug in LyX 2.0.0 on Ubuntu 11.04.
If the "article (paper)" document class is used with the "titlepage"
class option, there's an interaction between the "author" and
"institution" environments. "author" by itself will not be displayed in
the document
> This invalidates all patches hanging around for cosmetic reasons.
> Is this really necessary?
Why do you have patches hanging around?
Are you saying that changes are hostage to undisclosed patches that
someone might have?
And if it takes you more than 5 minutes to fix the conflicts that you
ge
Am 27.10.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes :
> ---
> src/AppleSpellChecker.cpp | 6 +-
> src/AspellChecker.cpp | 32 +++--
> src/Author.cpp| 13 +-
> src/BiblioInfo.cpp| 233 +-
> src/Bidi.cpp | 1 +
> src/BranchList.cpp
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
>>Change to use Modified Bernstein's hash function
>
| Doesn't this imply fileformat change/conversions so hashes generated
| in 2.0 are correctly recognized in 2.1?
Actually if I read the usage correctly we are free to change the hash
function.
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
>>Change to use Modified Bernstein's hash function
>
| Doesn't this imply fileformat change/conversions so hashes generated
| in 2.0 are correctly recognized in 2.1?
Right. The Author feature is really lacking in documentation.
This really seem
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
>Change to use Modified Bernstein's hash function
Doesn't this imply fileformat change/conversions so hashes generated
in 2.0 are correctly recognized in 2.1?
Pavel
We can get the id from the size of the author container.
---
src/Author.cpp | 3 +--
src/Author.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Author.cpp b/src/Author.cpp
index b19e2be..5efa1fa 100644
--- a/src/Author.cpp
+++ b/src/Author.cpp
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ bool a
Also remove the manual "optimization": 33 * hash == (hash << 5) + hash,
and just let the compiler handle that. The 33 really is important for
the function so it is nicer to let it stand out more.
---
src/Author.cpp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Author.
static int computeHash(docstring const & name,
docstring const & email)
{
string const full_author_string = to_utf8(name + email);
// Bernstein's hash function
unsigned int hash = 5381;
for (unsigned int c: full_author_string)
hash = ((hash <
André Pönitz wrote:
> > The oldest gcc I'm still encountering on actively used boxes around
> > is 4.2.1, but from my experiments with compiling/using LyX, the real
> > stopper is Qt version, because while we (should) still compile with
> > Qt 4.2.x
>
> This is, by the way, an absurd restriction.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:23:48AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> André Pönitz writes:
>
> | I thought I could simply shut up. Alas, it looks like I can't.
> >
> | On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:12:21AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> >>
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:00:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
> > now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>
> The oldest gcc I'm still encountering on actively used boxes around
> is 4.2.1, but from
André Pönitz writes:
| On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:35:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
>> now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>>
>> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
>
| Might b
André Pönitz writes:
| I thought I could simply shut up. Alas, it looks like I can't.
>
| On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:12:21AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>
>> | | BTW after some decade we still include boost in our tarballs and maintain
>>
André Pönitz writes:
| I thought I could simply shut up. Alas, it looks like I can't.
>
| On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:12:21AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>
>> | | BTW after some decade we still include boost in our tarballs and maintain
>>
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:35:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
> now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>
> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
Might be worth a look:
http://blogs.msd
I thought I could simply shut up. Alas, it looks like I can't.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:12:21AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | | BTW after some decade we still include boost in our tarballs and maintain
> | | its updates. What was the
25 matches
Mail list logo
