Are these patches OK for trunk and branch?
Thanks,
Scott
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 10/01/2012 04:04 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 01/10/2012 08:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> I, too have Precise ..., so this should not be the reason.
>
> > several liboost 1.40.0 libraries laying around.
>
> I have too, so no problem either ...
>
Hmm, but does it work when you use autotools instead of cmake?
Liviu
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> commit 2fa840b7716f5907362a1457b5ed189e675cfb57
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Fri Oct 5 09:59:44 2012 +0200
>
> Do not let the children's buffer params leak into the master (#5941)
Thanks Juergen.
Pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel, if this satisfies you, I will port to branch.
Works here. Pavel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard, this needs to go to branch as well, as an addition to 2f3acae9.
No, sorry. Actually, it's (only) this that needs to go to branch also.
dumpPreamble() exits after the preamble, so we need to restore the parenthood
there:
commit 63612ca99b4961c5997c788626da815
Richard, this needs to go to branch as well, as an addition to 2f3acae9.
Jürgen
Am Freitag 05 Oktober 2012, 18:28:44 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> The branch, master, has been updated.
>
> - Log -
>
> commit e6afdf1b2b1f707a69ac
Le 05/10/2012 17:50, Kornel Benko a écrit :
No, cosmetics reasons only. Nothing should mess source tree if one wants
to build outside the source. This way there may be any number of build trees
(each different configured).
I'd say that _some_ special make target can be intended to modify the
s
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 17:45:18, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/10/2012 17:08, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > As this target regenerates the reference output for the tests, which
> > > live in the git repo, I do not see why they should not go to the source
> > > tree.
> >
> > The t
Le 05/10/2012 17:08, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> As this target regenerates the reference output for the tests, which
> live in the git repo, I do not see why they should not go to the source
> tree.
The target makeregfiles creates
${srcdir}/tests/regfiles/check_{convert,filetools,lstrings}
In
On 10/05/2012 11:06 AM, John Carbone wrote:
I would like to request and also sponsor a new feature for LyX.
I propose the addition to styles entitled “BeginLabelType” and
“BeginLabelString” that would behave similar to “EndLabelType” and
“EndLabelString” but would place the label at the begin
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 15:17:07, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/10/2012 12:39, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build.
> > But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would like
> > to omit in cmake build.
> >
> > Could
I would like to request and also sponsor a new feature for LyX.
I propose the addition to styles entitled "BeginLabelType" and
"BeginLabelString" that would behave similar to "EndLabelType" and
"EndLabelString" but would place the label at the beginning of the
paragraph (or sequence of paragra
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 14:59:57, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/10/2012 12:44, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > As of now, there is no change in cmake because cmake does not handle the
> > checks yet.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> JMarc
Now it does.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: Th
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Normally, the checks looks at both boost-signals and boost-signals-mt.
>
> Could you look later in the log file for more information?
>
Indeed, I missed this one:
configure:7409: g++ -o conftest -g -O -Wextra -Wall-lboost_signals-mt
Le 05/10/2012 12:39, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build.
But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would like
to omit in cmake build.
Could they please be rewritten to work in build-tree?
As this target regenerates the reference
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Thus, I propose the attached patch (for trunk only).
>
> Objections?
Since there were none, I went ahead and committed.
Jürgen
Le 05/10/2012 13:21, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>> wrote:
> What error do you get in config.log?
>
Oh, sorry. Forgot to attach the relevant files. I think that this is the
relevant part:
configure:7351: checking whet
Le 05/10/2012 12:44, Kornel Benko a écrit :
As of now, there is no change in cmake because cmake does not handle the
checks yet.
OK, thanks.
JMarc
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 14:20:45, schrieb Liviu Andronic
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > # dpkg -S /usr/lib/libboost_signals.so.1.46.1
> > /usr/lib/libboost_regex.so.1.46.1
> >
> > libboost-signals1.46.1: /usr/lib/libboost_signals.so.1.46.1
> >
> > libboost-regex
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> # dpkg -S /usr/lib/libboost_signals.so.1.46.1
> /usr/lib/libboost_regex.so.1.46.1
>
> libboost-signals1.46.1: /usr/lib/libboost_signals.so.1.46.1
>
> libboost-regex1.46.1: /usr/lib/libboost_regex.so.1.46.1
>
For some reason (previous upgrade fr
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 13:21:48, schrieb Liviu Andronic
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
> > What error do you get in config.log?
> >
> Oh, sorry. Forgot to attach the relevant files. I think that this is the
> relevant part:
> configure:7351: checking whe
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> What error do you get in config.log?
>
Oh, sorry. Forgot to attach the relevant files. I think that this is the
relevant part:
configure:7351: checking whether to use included boost library
configure:7369: result: no
configure:7392: g+
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 12:05:57, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/10/2012 11:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > The branch, master, has been updated.
> >
> > - Log -
> >
> > commit 4729b1c35de08963cf8b40b59bcf50d427f2
Hi,
I wanted to add the target makeregfiles to cmake build.
But the tests (in automake) are messing the source tree, which I would like
to omit in cmake build.
Could they please be rewritten to work in build-tree?
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le 05/10/2012 10:40, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
Hello
I am trying to compile trunk with system boost libraries, but fail.
Upon running
./configure --without-included-boost
What error do you get in config.log?
JMarc
Le 05/10/2012 11:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
The branch, master, has been updated.
- Log -
commit 4729b1c35de08963cf8b40b59bcf50d427f2bb0c
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Fri Oct 5 11:55:23 2012 +0200
Fix make ch
Richard Heck wrote:
> > Fix attached.
>
> Looks good.
I'll commit to trunk. For branch, I propose to psotpone to 2.0.6.
Jürgen
Hello
I am trying to compile trunk with system boost libraries, but fail.
Upon running
./configure --without-included-boost
on GIT 66cb259, I get this message:
The following problems have been detected by configure.
Please check the messages below before running 'make'.
(see the sec
28 matches
Mail list logo
