Re: r39835 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 23:36, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: You are still missing the point. If I say insert \input{name} as ERT, it is clear that I mean [[\input{name}]] but if I say insert \input{name} as TeX code, I could mean either the previous construct or this one: [[\input{]]name[[}]] No, becau

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I'm giving up, but you should try yourself to answer the following question. What happens if TEXINPUTS is already set in the environment when LyX is launched? Then it would be a prefix. But this is not the case except I add this variable manuall

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process > > So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the > command "set" in a batch file). But then it is

Re: r39835 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:35:35PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > In the UserGuide I name the inset/box is TeX code. When I write > "insert \blah" as TeX code, I also give this as example > > [[\blah]] > > There are many cases in the docs where something like this is described: > > [[\href{]]http:

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the command "set" in a batch file). But then it is no prefix to an existing variable, but the variable itself. That was

Re: r39835 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 19:26, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I only want to have a consistent naming - in my opinion this is important for a documentation. So, you should have continued using ERT. Note that it was not me who invented the term "TeX code". The menu Insert->TeX code existed already when I

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > >>variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > >>_prefix_? > > > >Because TEXINPUTS may already

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, I must admit that I then did not yet understand th

Re: r39856 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 16:23, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: No, the established English term is "Old Style Figure" or "Text Figure". Hence the usual abbreviation "OSF" which you have in font names containing these figures. See for instance... OK, then we should use this term. I will now change the docs

Cleaning up GuiProgress at exit

2011-10-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Hi, still looking at cleanup code on exit, I found a few TODOs about the GuiProgress singleton instance created by GuiView, that we never knew when to delete. The attached patch fixes this by using a shared_ptr. Any comment ? Would it be useful to have this in ? The rationale is as usual to

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:18:39AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, in which case its content should be ap

Re: r39835 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_2_0_X

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:18:24PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 08:11, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>If you make now an announcement wit the term "ERT" we can expect > >>that most of the users don't know what we mean. > > > > From a random check on the postings in the users list it

Re: r39856 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

2011-10-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Before I changed this, I of course had a look and "Mediävalziffern" is one > of the possible translations of "old style numerals". Makes also sense to > me because "Ziffer" is the German word for numeral and not for figure. No, the established English term is "Old Style Figure"

Re: r39856 - lyx-devel/trunk/po

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 08:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: uwesto...@lyx.org wrote: #: src/frontends/qt4/ui/FontUi.ui:223 msgid "Use&Old Style Figures" -msgstr "&Mediävalziffern verwenden" +msgstr "&Verwende alten Bilderstil" Uwe, this is wrong. "Mediävalziffern" is the correct German term for Old