Kornel Benko wrote:
> > there is no harm to simply kill it and treat layouttranslation as a normal
> > source file.
> > its just for manual regeneration and for the people who know what they are
> > doing..
> > pavel
> >
>
> No dear. There is a problem. In autotools, there is a method to create
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Sorry for that. Making diff of created to commited file, there was never a
> > difference, so I even didn't consider it to be a problem.
> > Will check, how to proceed.
>
> there is no harm to simply kill it and treat la
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Sorry for that. Making diff of created to commited file, there was never a
> difference, so I even didn't consider it to be a problem.
> Will check, how to proceed.
there is no harm to simply kill it and treat layouttranslation as a normal
source file.
its just for manual r
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > > Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > > > I don't know, ask cmake about it. autotools do not complain.
> > > >
> > > > This is not correct. Autotools needs polib too.
> > >
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > > I don't know, ask cmake about it. autotools do not complain.
> > >
> > > This is not correct. Autotools needs polib too.
> >
> > where? it was never installed on my box and building worked f
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > I don't know, ask cmake about it. autotools do not complain.
> >
> > This is not correct. Autotools needs polib too.
>
> where? it was never installed on my box and building worked fine.
> pavel
>
It is used, when
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > I don't know, ask cmake about it. autotools do not complain.
>
> This is not correct. Autotools needs polib too.
where? it was never installed on my box and building worked fine.
pavel
> Anyone want to give this approval?
i was waiting for JMarc... from my side its ok.
pavel
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 13/04/2011 18:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
> >>> not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I
> >>
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 13/04/2011 18:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
> >>> not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I
> >>
Anyone want to give this approval?
On 04/13/2011 12:48 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/13/2011 12:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/04/2011 16:58, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets
On 04/13/2011 06:35 PM, Jim Oldfield wrote:
Hi everyone,
If I read the Wiki correctly, a fresh installation of LyX 2.0 should pick up
the preferences and user.bind of an existing LyX 1.6 install automatically. Is
that correct? Only this doesn't seem to be working for me.
My existing install
I have very much enjoyed using LyX 2.0! Thanks to the development team for
your efforts!
A few minor things that I have found recently regarding forward/reverse PDF
search on Mac with Skim:
In section 5.6 of "Additional.lyx" on the "Skim" directions for reverse
search, there is a problem with th
Hi everyone,
If I read the Wiki correctly, a fresh installation of LyX 2.0 should pick up
the preferences and user.bind of an existing LyX 1.6 install automatically. Is
that correct? Only this doesn't seem to be working for me.
My existing install is 1.6.9, with prefs in:
C:\User\Jim\
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110413211218.ga8...@sirio.sssup.it...
My wild guess is that that pdfview thingie is using DDE commands for
opening pdf files. As Adobe changed the servername in Reader X, it
does not work anymore. LyX is not the only software which was broken.
Have a l
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:03:04PM -0300, Diego Queiroz wrote:
> This is due a "bug" in in LyX.
>
> The workaround is at this thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg86089.html
>
>
> I don't know what causes this and why changing this configuration solves the
> problem,
Am 13.04.2011 um 22:26 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker:
> #7429: Endless loop with spellchecker with Master/Child-documents
> +---
> Reporter: klwy|Owner: lasgouttes
> Type: defect | Status: closed
>
On 13.04.2011 14:22, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 April 2011 08:59:58 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Me too. Trunk is in an impressively good shape, compared to previous
>> major releases and given the lot of new features an changes.
>
+1
> I agree.
> For further evidence lyx-2.0 has been
Am 13.04.2011 um 20:54 schrieb kuem...@lyx.org:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Wed Apr 13 20:54:58 2011
> New Revision: 38369
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38369
>
> Log:
> #7452, no spellcheck menu needed when no text is below cursor
Thanks.
Stephan
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 02:44 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>> And this
>>
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7407/static_get_home_dir.patch
>>
>> for
>>
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7407 ?
>>
> Looks fine to me, assuming it fixes the crash.
again the same here.
pavel
On 04/13/2011 02:44 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
And this
http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7407/static_get_home_dir.patch
for
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7407 ?
Looks fine to me, assuming it fixes the crash.
rh
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 02:42 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7452/7452.patch
>>
>> Could this go in?
>>
>> Fix for http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7452
>>
> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm not that familiar with this code.
+1
pavel
On 04/13/2011 02:42 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7452/7452.patch
Could this go in?
Fix for http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7452
Looks reasonable to me, but I'm not that familiar with this code.
Richard
And this
http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7407/static_get_home_dir.patch
for
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7407 ?
Peter
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7452/7452.patch
Could this go in?
Fix for http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7452
Peter
--
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Wed Apr 13 19:47:03 2011
> New Revision: 38366
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38366
>
> Log:
> We have one missing string due to the bug in lyx_pot
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg167433.html
this also means that nobo
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> you are right, there must be some bug in the way we produce strings
> from menu files, i guess OptSubMenu item is the problem.
The regexes in lyx_pot.py are case sensitive, but the tags in the .ui files
are not. Actually, many regexes in lyx_pot.py need to be case insensitiv
This is due a "bug" in in LyX.
The workaround is at this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg86089.html
I don't know what causes this and why changing this configuration solves the
problem, but I am forwarding this again to devel list.
---
Diego Queiroz
2011/4/13 R
On 04/13/2011 12:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/04/2011 16:58, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets copied to the original directory, not those for the children.
They do seem to be
On 04/13/2011 12:06 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/04/2011 16:58, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets copied to the original directory, not those for the children.
They do seem to be
On 04/13/2011 11:43 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
On 2011-04-12, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/12/2011 11:01 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
1.) Is it possible to export footnotes at the end of a chapter as
EndNotes? The style currently in use (which shows the note when you
hover over it with the mouse), doesn't corre
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13/04/2011 18:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
>>> not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I
>>> do
>>> not have access to /usr/local. What is the easy way
Le 13/04/2011 18:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I do
not have access to /usr/local. What is the easy way to install a python
library in my local directo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
> not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I do
> not have access to /usr/local. What is the easy way to install a python
> library in my local directory?
why you should need polib for n
I just noticed that cmake builds fail because I do
not have polib on my ubuntu 9.10. I tried to install it by myself but I
do not have access to /usr/local. What is the easy way to install a
python library in my local directory?
JMarc
Le 13/04/2011 16:58, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets copied to the original directory, not those for the children.
They do seem to be generated in the temp dir, just not copied.
The att
> On 2011-04-12, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 04/12/2011 11:01 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
>
>>> 1.) Is it possible to export footnotes at the end of a chapter as
>>> EndNotes? The style currently in use (which shows the note when you
>>> hover over it with the mouse), doesn't correctly render in a few
>>>
> You loose. LyX adds a number.
It was just an example. If LyX adds an ID or not, it doesn't really matter.
There is no link between the number and the contents of the document.
> If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is
important.
You're right. But I'm not trying to con
On 13/04/2011 10:58 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets copied to the original directory, not those for the children.
They do seem to be generated in the temp dir, just not copied.
The att
On 04/12/2011 12:23 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
If you export LaTeX (XeTeX), then only the .tex file for the master
gets copied to the original directory, not those for the children.
They do seem to be generated in the temp dir, just not copied.
The attached patch fixes this bug. It appears ther
Here's the patch. I hope works fine. It would be nice to put it in 2.0 but I
think it's impossible as it's late and I've added a string ("Search", maybe we
already have it). Moreover it's my first patch in C++ to LyX, so probably it
will be full of inconsistencies.
It adds a search box to Tools
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I think you are correct about it being a bit complicated, but not too much so.
> The issue is what happens if you apply a style to text that already has that
> style (or at least attributes of that style). When you apply the style, any
> attribute not already present will be
Jesper Stemann Andersen sait.dk> writes:
> While translating LyX to Danish I have stumbled on the Text Style dialog. What
is meant by "Never Toggled"
> for the Size-selector, "Always Toggled" for the Miscellaneous-selector and
what does the "Toggle all"
> checkbox do?
>
I think you are correct
> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of
> LyX, and not block good ideas.
Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on
functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs
to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and de
On 04/12/2011 04:20 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 12/04/2011 15:14, Richard Heck ha scritto:
On 04/12/2011 04:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 12/04/2011 02:23, Richard Heck ha scritto:
On 04/11/2011 06:15 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I guess that, at the end of findAndReplace() in lyxfind
José Matos wrote:
> Susana did not complain to me once during this cycle, that is my best
> benchmark. ;-)
send my greetings! ( and when will come the update of pt.po ? :D )
pavel
On Wednesday 13 April 2011 08:59:58 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Me too. Trunk is in an impressively good shape, compared to previous
> major releases and given the lot of new features an changes.
I agree.
For further evidence lyx-2.0 has been in Fedora 14 (released last November)
and the number
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I even think you RC3 should have been final...
no way, layouttranslations are still under movement.
pavel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I have no bug number or report.
>> But it looks right.:)
>> Jürgen, please, can you have a look if it makes sense?
>
> It does, AFAICS (without further testing, though).
ok. pavel
Stephan Witt wrote:
I have no bug number or report.
But it looks right.:)
Jürgen, please, can you have a look if it makes sense?
It does, AFAICS (without further testing, though).
Jürgen
Stephan Witt wrote:
> It's only enchant missing the implementation.
> All other supported backends have one.
aha, then go for this as well.
pavel
Am 13.04.2011 um 12:02 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 12.04.2011 um 20:15 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
1) A forgotten implementation of "remove from personal dictionary" for
enchant.
2) Some fixes for misspelled marker and cursor move. (Inspire
> BTW, on the way of revising, I noticed one entry is missing in .po
> file. When you try to do "advanced search", menu "Insert -> Insert
> Regular Expression" appears. But it doesn't seem it is in the po file
> as far as I see in en.po file. I appreciate if you could check it.
> Thanks,
> Koji
yo
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 12.04.2011 um 20:15 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> 1) A forgotten implementation of "remove from personal dictionary" for
> >> enchant.
> >> 2) Some fixes for misspelled marker and cursor move. (Inspired by
> >> Vincent's questions)
> >> 3) Check for
Le 12/04/2011 18:45, Georg Baum a écrit :
This command is used as an argument of the babel magic
\addto\\captionsgerman etc. This does not work without \protect. I am not
100% sure whether this was the reason, but I am sure that I first tried the
translation stuff without \protect and that it did
On 2011-04-12, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 05:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 12/04/2011 02:32, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit :
>>> -\newcommand\thmsname{Theorem}
>>> +\newcommand\thmsname{\protect\theoremname}
>> I think I missed some discussion. Why is the \protect needed here?
On 2011-04-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> If I have compiled a document using XeTeX and then switch back to
>> regular LaTeX (or vice versa), I often see LaTeX errors. I take it that
>> this is because some .tex files are still in the old format. Probably we
>> need to cl
On 2011-04-12, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 11:01 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
>> 1.) Is it possible to export footnotes at the end of a chapter as
>> EndNotes? The style currently in use (which shows the note when you
>> hover over it with the mouse), doesn't correctly render in a few
>> mobile br
Hi,
While translating LyX to Danish I have stumbled on the Text Style dialog. What
is meant by "Never Toggled" for the Size-selector, "Always Toggled" for the
Miscellaneous-selector and what does the "Toggle all" checkbox do?
The documentation does not shine too much of a light on this either -
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
i haven't decided yet whether we should go for rc4 (~20th) or directly
final one (~29th). lets see what will happen to the codebase in between.
Please no further RC (and keep the strict commit rules). IMO the code is
stable enough for the final release. In the past the .
On 04/12/2011 06:50 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
i haven't decided yet whether we should go for rc4 (~20th) or directly
final one (~29th). lets see what will happen to the codebase in between.
Please no further RC (and keep the strict commit rules). IMO the code is
stable enough fo
61 matches
Mail list logo
