Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While performing some tests to check Georg's bug #3016 resolution,
> I found what I think might be another unrelated bug in branch and trunk:
> when
> * paper format is set to default
> * margins are explicitly set
> export to latex sends the [letterpa
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> This problem occurs probably in many if not all optional arguments. LyX
> could try to prevent this, so you could file a report on our tracker.
I noted that we already do this in the OptArg inset where we embrace content
if we find a ] character.
Should we just do th
James C. Sutherland utah.edu> writes:
In the subfigure caption, you can enter math mode (C-M), type \ensuremath
followed by a space (to get an inset nested in the math inset), type [B] there
and you should be good to go.
/Paul
James C. Sutherland wrote:
> Is there a known work-around for this problem?
A workaround is to embrace the whole math thing in ERT "{" and "}".
This problem occurs probably in many if not all optional arguments. LyX could
try to prevent this, so you could file a report on our tracker.
Jürgen
I may have discovered a bug, but it may be in LaTeX itself.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a figure float
2. create a sub-float within it.
3. In the subfloat caption, enter (in math mode): $[A]$, where $
indicates math mode.
4. Compile the file.
This results in a LaTeX error that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If we are confident that clsguide is right, we can redefine these two
> macros and input the files. But this is risky IMO.
Yes, risky and beyond my LaTeX confidence.
For the time being, I switched back to the mapping=tex-text option that is
also understood by older
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> I also was thinking that another reproducibility issue is due to the
> configuration of LyX. If you have in your home folder any custom
> options, or scripts, or extended commands or modified key bindings
> or whatever else, then some tests might fail. For example, I gues
Il 01/02/2011 11:22, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
possibilities. Just need to fix what else is needed in order to have the
test run properly on a non-Italian machine (I have to find an English
installation somewhere and try).
you dont know what box are you opening :) there a
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> possibilities. Just need to fix what else is needed in order to have the
> test run properly on a non-Italian machine (I have to find an English
> installation somewhere and try).
you dont know what box are you opening :) there are many strange issues
which affect whet
Le 01/02/2011 09:52, Guenter Milde a écrit :
The clsguide tells:
The first thing a class or package file does is identify itself. Package
files do this as follows:
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{ package }[ dateother information ]
e.g.
\ProvidesPackage{fontspec}
[2008
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Parsing this should not bee too difficult with Python -- watch that there
> might be line breaks between the \ProvidesPackage command and the
> arguments.
For a proper detection, we would need a tex solution, since configure.ltx is a
tex file.
Jürgen
On 2011-02-01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Julien Rioux wrote:
>> > Is here a TeX method to find out a package version other than LaTeX's
>> > \@ifpackagelater? With the latter, the packages need to be loaded in
>> > advance, and we can't do that in checkconfig.ltx.
>> \RequirePackage[]{}[]
> We
Julien Rioux wrote:
> > Is here a TeX method to find out a package version other than LaTeX's
> > \@ifpackagelater? With the latter, the packages need to be loaded in
> > advance, and we can't do that in checkconfig.ltx.
>
> \RequirePackage[]{}[]
We cannot use this in checkconfig.ltx either. We a
13 matches
Mail list logo
