hi,
please can somebody explain me what is meant by the string
"try to reconfigure using only the defaults"
inside
"LyX will only have minimal functionality because no textclasses have been"
"found. You can either try to reconfigure LyX normally, try to reconfigure"
"using only the defaults, or
On 03/12/2010 20:29, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Dec 3 20:29:46 2010
New Revision: 36696
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36696
Log:
Proper fix now for bug #6846. The idea, due to JMarc, is to collect
bibliography information in updateBuffer(), rather than doing a wholl
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
> > bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
>
> except #7026 which is already in pipe none of them looked as showstopper.
> would you prefer delay
Am 03.12.2010 um 18:48 schrieb b...@lyx.org:
> Author: baum
> Date: Fri Dec 3 18:48:06 2010
> New Revision: 36687
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36687
>
> Log:
> fix bug #6584
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/Language.cpp
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/Language.h
> lyx-devel/trunk/src
I just placed a reminder for this into the Trac as #7137.
T.
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Advanced Search: Main WA disappears on wrap-around dialog
Data: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:51:01 +0100
Mittente: Tommaso Cucinotta
A: LyX Developers
Hello,
while usi
Georg Baum wrote:
> I see. That means that this code is unrelated.
>
> > the only exception is argument "on" (which was previously used in
> > menu) so insert was possible only from text mode.
>
> Why previously? It is still used. And why is insert nowadays also possible
> from math mode? This i
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:58:32PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Even some big guns were claiming for a while that deque is
> > > uniformly better
> >
> > could you be more explicit about the source? sutter?
>
> Yes, I believe so.
he revoked his
hi,
please can somebody explain me what is meant by the string
"try to reconfigure using only the defaults"
inside
"LyX will only have minimal functionality because no textclasses have been "
"found. You can either try to reconfigure LyX normally, try to reconfigure "
"using only the defaults, o
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:58:32PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Even some big guns were claiming for a while that deque is
> > uniformly better
>
> could you be more explicit about the source? sutter?
Yes, I believe so.
Andre'
On 03/12/2010 20:29, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Dec 3 20:29:46 2010
New Revision: 36696
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36696
Log:
Proper fix now for bug #6846. The idea, due to JMarc, is to collect
bibliography information in updateBuffer(), rather than doing a wholl
Am 03.12.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:44:57AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>>
Stephan Witt wrote:
> There is a patch pending from
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Even some big guns were claiming for a while that deque is
> uniformly better
could you be more explicit about the source? sutter?
pavel
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I attempted to generate some debugging info. As expected, I needed a couple
> of tries, but after persevering long enough the usual crash came. The
> document is very simple (see attached) and contains an error in the R code.
> Let me know if this is the proper way of debugg
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:09:48PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 12/02/2010 04:54 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >>I read somewhere that stacks are best implemented as deques. Don't ask me
> >>why now,
> >>but I think they are slightly cheaper. (I'm sure Andre would have a view
> >>about thi
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:44:57AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> >> Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> There is a patch pending from Georg.
> >>> I present it here again and propose to
Georg Baum wrote:
> See subject. There is explicit code that removes the "on" argument, so that
> it does not get disabled. Somebody must have thought something when
> implementing this, but I don't understand the reason.
its a hack. if you put argument to math-mode lfun, it goes inside math env
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 06:40:39PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>> > Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>> >
>> >> 2) replace all occurrences of isDigit() with isDigitASCII()
>>
>> I don't know. Unless somebody goes through all
veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> > yes it is, but i dont want now any refactoring which is not needed for
> > fixing
> bug.
> > that belongs to 2.1 devel cycle.
>
> Mmmh, I'm not very experienced in this kind of things. Does this mean that if
> I
> send you the patch won't get in trunk until the
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:18:32PM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> P.S. What about printing on the LyX console the output of the preview scripts?
> It would make debugging them a lot easier.
You should now know how it works: If you really want it, you propose a
patch and it will be though
See subject. There is explicit code that removes the "on" argument, so that
it does not get disabled. Somebody must have thought something when
implementing this, but I don't understand the reason.
Disabling the math-mode lfun when the cursor is inside math and the argument
is on would fix bug
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 06:40:39PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> > Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> >
> >> 2) replace all occurrences of isDigit() with isDigitASCII()
>
> I don't know. Unless somebody goes through all usages and confirms that
> indeed an
> yes it is, but i dont want now any refactoring which is not needed for fixing
bug.
> that belongs to 2.1 devel cycle.
Mmmh, I'm not very experienced in this kind of things. Does this mean that if I
send you the patch won't get in trunk until the release of 2.0?
Is it the same for the python scri
On 03/12/2010 1:18 PM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
Thank you for your support in this patch! I really wanted it, and a lot of
friends of mine will love it;)
Thanks for the patch, I am looking forward to have instant preview of
tikz figures.
--
Julien
veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> Yes, use ps2pdf, it should work.
> I'll try to join the lilypond and classic instant-preview scripts tomorrow. Is
> that OK for you?
> Moreover I would try to implement the --output=png thing, it's more elegant.
yes it is, but i dont want now any refactoring which
@Pavel:
> i tried. instant preview works, but pdflatex for generating .pdf output fails.
> thats expected?
Yes, use ps2pdf, it should work.
I'll try to join the lilypond and classic instant-preview scripts tomorrow. Is
that OK for you?
Moreover I would try to implement the --output=png thing, it'
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 06:47:37PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > > one related request: could you post patch for examples/instant_preview.lyx
> > > which contains working example for tikz and example f
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > one related request: could you post patch for examples/instant_preview.lyx
> > which contains working example for tikz and example for pstrick?
> > we should distribute it as well.
>
> See attached.
i t
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
>> It's becoming a mess. We have isdigit(), isDigit(), isDigitASCII(),
>> and now iswdigit() enters the scene.
>
> iswdigit() is POSIX standard for wchar_t arguments - our char_type
> is a typedef of wchar_t. But I don't i
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:09:51PM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> > Given that it is not that simple, I would go with 1) for the moment.
> > The latex call occurs twice only if the legacy route is chosen
> > and only if dvipng is available. We can think about it later if it
> > turns out
El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400
rgheck escribió:
Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits.
I've also committed part of this patch
I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module
instead of as an executable script. Here is a patch
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > one related request: could you post patch for
> > > > examples/instant_preview.lyx
> > > > which contains working example for tikz and example for pstrick?
> > > > we should distribute it as well.
> > >
> > > See attached.
> >
> > i'll wait for the rest from the
On 03/12/2010 18:26, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 o
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none
Op 3-12-2010 18:23, Richard Heck schreef:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none
On 03/12/2010 18:23, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none o
On 12/03/2010 12:21 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hum I have a better one: the graphics stuff!!!
Speaking of which, can you look again at #6949?
Richard
On 12/02/2010 07:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I think we should do something about the large amount of critical
bugs. I believe there are 12 that have a bug number of 7000 or higher.
except #7026 which is already in pipe none of them looked as showstopper.
would you p
On 03/12/2010 16:23, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I did no serious investigation until now...
Only one example:
I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what
happened...
Am 03.12.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Another example:
>> Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar.
>> Where to start and what classes has to be changed?
>
> void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;)
>
> and
>
>pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5, yo
Dear devels
Running beta1 on Xubuntu 10.04, 64-bit.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Liviu Andronic
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> care to produce recipies or at least backtraces? they are not going to be
>> fixed unless somebody reports them...
>>
> Yes, I plan
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> and soon you'll get another ones ...
>> few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as possible
>> :)
>>
>
> Quite frankly when I look at this LaTeX dependent code I find the painting
> code very simple in comparison :-)
then we should establish r
On 03/12/2010 16:13, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I
Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I did no serious investigation until now...
Only one example:
I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what
happened...
The cursor was misplaced badly.
and soon you'll g
On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I did no serious investigation until now...
Only one example:
I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened...
The cursor was misplaced badly.
and soon you'll get another ones ...
few times i tried to
Another example:
Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar.
Where to start and what classes has to be changed?
void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;)
and
pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5, yo_ - row_.ascent(), 3, height,
Color_changebar);
5 is the offset from
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I did no serious investigation until now...
> Only one example:
> I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened...
> The cursor was misplaced badly.
and soon you'll get another ones ...
few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as p
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
>>
>>
>>> On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>>
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> I would suspect that a wavy line might
On 03/12/2010 15:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might
Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
Word, gtkspell, OOo, et
On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was
Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>
>>> I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
>>> Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original
>>> implementation (although the
On 03/12/2010 15:18, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
you seriously mean that there is arabic translation for eg "hunspell"?
Maybe no translation, but a transliteration (i.e., use of arabic script).
there was some point in having "aspell (libary)" as a translatable
s
On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS
Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original
implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ).
so we are at circles, sinc
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> you seriously mean that there is arabic translation for eg "hunspell"?
Maybe no translation, but a transliteration (i.e., use of arabic script).
> there was some point in having "aspell (libary)" as a translatable
> string in 1.6 but now we have only pure names of programs.
>
On 02/12/2010 22:45, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
Kin
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> sanda wrote:
> > Author: sanda
> > Date: Thu Dec 2 21:13:50 2010
> > New Revision: 36662
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36662
> >
> > Log:
> > Nothing to translate here.
>
> Are you sure? At the minimum, the strings might be translated to another
> script
Hi Rob,
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear LyX Developers,
>
> I don't want to re-open the debate on the Font preferences dialog, but ...
> I found that the new design was slightly distracting. In particular the
> presence of the "Use non-TeX fonts" checkbox at the top of the list was
> driving me nuts. B
vfr wrote:
> Author: vfr
> Date: Fri Dec 3 08:38:32 2010
> New Revision: 36675
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36675
>
> Log:
> *nl.po
nice! I would very welcome this in branch, too.
Jürgen
sanda wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Thu Dec 2 21:13:50 2010
> New Revision: 36662
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36662
>
> Log:
> Nothing to translate here.
Are you sure? At the minimum, the strings might be translated to another
script (Greek, Arabic) in some translations.
Jürgen
Am 02.12.2010 um 20:08 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>>
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare
> the two versions
60 matches
Mail list logo
