On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:33:58AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 03.12.2010 um 04:36 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:44:57AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > >> Stephan Witt wrote: > >>> There is a patch pending from Georg. > >>> I present it here again and propose to apply it. > >>> > >>> The second part of the patch is mine. > >>> It encapsulates the crucial hasDigit into an ignoreWord() method to > >>> prepare to solve the FIXME and to propose an alternate implementation. > >>> > >>> The latter is not that important... > >> > >> is Enrico fine with the isDigit part? p > > > > It's becoming a mess. We have isdigit(), isDigit(), isDigitASCII(), > > and now iswdigit() enters the scene. > > iswdigit() is POSIX standard for wchar_t arguments - our char_type > is a typedef of wchar_t. But I don't insist here.
I thought it was a typedef to a 32 bit integer type, even on systems where wchar_t is only 16? Andre'
