On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:40 PM, wrote:
> Any other useful link?
>
http://www.lyx.org/Development
Regards
Liviu
> I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a
> hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an "InPreamble" tag, intended primarily
> for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the
> preamble. It should be possible to create a "Preamble" layout, with
> InPreamble true,
On 11/27/10 10:03 PM, Michal wrote:
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I hav
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I have some idea which, as I suppose, would b
In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've
spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but
there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win
XP SP3 Polish.
If something is unclear, please ask - I'm writing this in a hurry,
hopin
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:18:56PM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> BTW: could someone apply the part of the patch about lyxpreview-tools.py?
I fixed that problem in a more general way at r36545.
BTW, this was a regression introduced at r33554.
BTW2, currently LyX asserts whenever the cur
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> also dont know whether killing dvipng is harmless or introduce new regressions
Well, right now dvipng is not mandatory. If it is not found in the path,
the legacy method is anyway used.
> but it doesn't seem to be good idea in the mi
On 2010-11-27, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2010-11-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> > Guenter Milde wrote:
>> >> Both xelatex and luatlaex can use TeX fonts and PSNFSS:
>> > OK, I tried this now. The two engines indeed seem to be able to deal with
>> > these font packages
> it means untrivial ditching into the dispatch mechanism, so this is for sure
not
> 2.0 business.
OK, then I'll just start thinking about it. Maybe a first release of the
scripting support could not have such events, but just keypresses as
notification in LyX server.
I don't know how these things
Well, in this thread several different point of views appeared.
I've put a up a pool to get a decision together quickly.
http://micropoll.com/t/KEkx4ZBgk0
I think we should drop dvipng, or at least allow to set whether to use dvipng or
the legacy method in a LyX-wide manner, even if I think that
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> The result is the next patch:
>>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>>> 3. co
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> The result is the next patch:
>>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>>> 3. co
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> The result is the next patch:
>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>> 3. correct the absolute word count
>>
>> Better?
>
> I can
veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> > who told you? iirc adv search and adv math macros appeared this way...
>
> I read somewhere on the wiki that new contributors have to stay in a corner
> fixing bugs for a pair of years before they can implement new features. :D
can't remember such kind of rules.
veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> > on a first sight it looks like a bad idea to introduce fileformat option for
> switching some background hacks we use in converter machinery
>
> Pavel, I proposed my idea to the list before starting to code, but I didn't
> receive any reply!
one can easily rever
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the absolute word count
Better?
I cannot tell. This code is very fragile (although better than in 1.6),
only tho
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
>>> on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
>>> Does anybody have an explanation?
>>> The attached
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
>> on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
>> Does anybody have an explanation?
>> The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and wor
Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
I complicated an already existing code in order to be able t
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
Stephan
Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp
==
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 02:26:44PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > > Regarding the naming: it is IMO best to call the button "use System
> > > > fonts".
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I won't touch the naming anymore.
> >
> > I agree with G
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2010-11-26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> Both xelatex and luatlaex can use TeX fonts and PSNFSS:
> > OK, I tried this now. The two engines indeed seem to be able to deal with
> > these font packages. However, as soon as the fontspec package is lo
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > Regarding the naming: it is IMO best to call the button "use System
> > > fonts".
> >
> >
> >
> > I won't touch the naming anymore.
>
> I agree with Günter. Please reconsider.
Well, my initial proposal was "Use System Fonts". Then people
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:51:43AM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> I proposed my idea to the list before starting to code, but I didn't
> receive any reply!
You have to get accustomed to how a team-driven free software project works.
Who implemented the new method has withdrawn from LyX d
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:25:51AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Regarding the naming: it is IMO best to call the button "use System
> > fonts".
>
> I won't touch the naming anymore.
I agree with Günter. Please reconsider.
--
Enrico
> to give you wider overview, i have been asking about must-have new features
for 2.0 each month from early spring and formally closed the gates by beta1, so
little bit late...
I always arrive too late in this sort of things :D Anyway it's not too urgent,
maybe it could be ready for the next relea
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Regarding the naming: it is IMO best to call the button "use System
> fonts".
I won't touch the naming anymore.
Jürgen
27 matches
Mail list logo
