hi,
as we are now in beta i increased severity of bugs which are regressions
compared to 1.6.
Edwin, could you possibly look on the tabular bugs: 6908, 7021, 7007 ?
JMarc, these two seems to have somthing in comon with you ;) : 6768 (at point
machinery), 6930 (undo broken)
perhaps Richard? -
Am 13.11.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
>>> this version as included gettext.
>>
>> It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
>> Otherwise the build stops because of
Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the tools.
My work-around was denied with the argument "encour
Hello,
I eventually wrote to Frank Mittelbach about the varioref issue with active
characters.
I tested a patch he sent me, which worked fine on my test example.
He committed it to svn, so it will be corrected soon in CTAN.
Sorry for the delay, he was very responsive, many thanks to him.
--
J
Le 13/11/2010 16:57, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
In the meantime, I have furthermore changed BabelPreamble to
PostBabelPreamble (to make clear this code is inserted after babel
and assuming we might introduce also a PreBabelPreamble [bug #4786])
The next thing we might want to add there is Quo
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> Pavel, one more question:
> why you are asking "didn't you commit for example from a different box
> before?"
if you commit from another box1, you must first checkout in box2 before
committing
from box2, thats all...
with the gnome-keyring i have no experience, but
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel, can I shove this in?
yes
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks very good.
Thanks.
> Just a small spacing problem there
> +# LangVariety
I noted that already, thanks.
> Also you might want to remove the "RTL false" statements, assuming that
> false is the default.
I thought about it, too. (I first worried th
Le 13 nov. 10 à 14:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I'll post a polished patch later, where I resolved the remaining
issues.
Here it comes. Includes some harmonization of tag spelling and the
necessary
lyx_pot.py changes.
Looks very good. Just a small spacing pr
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:57:54PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 13.11.2010 um 13:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> > Le 13 nov. 10 à 12:29, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >> I don't know how that single instance enforcement is attained, but if
> >> that is true, you should not be able to lau
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I'll post a polished patch later, where I resolved the remaining issues.
Here it comes. Includes some harmonization of tag spelling and the necessary
lyx_pot.py changes.
Jürgen
Index: lib/languages
===
--
Am 13.11.2010 um 13:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 13 nov. 10 à 12:29, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>> I don't know how that single instance enforcement is attained, but if
>> that is true, you should not be able to launch a new instance of lyx
>> by using the --no-remote switch. So, launch
Le 13 nov. 10 à 12:29, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
I don't know how that single instance enforcement is attained, but if
that is true, you should not be able to launch a new instance of lyx
by using the --no-remote switch. So, launch lyx a first time, then try
to get a new instance using "lyx --n
On 13 November 2010 19:42, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
>>
>> there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is to go to
>> console,
>> and try to commit from there and look what will happen.
>> didn't you commit for example from a different box before?
>>
>
> Yes, the first I found th
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:47:22AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 11/12/2010 04:34 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> Here is a complete patch with preferences and command line switches.
> >>
> >> It is designed such that an already running instance is contacted only
> >> wh
>
> there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is to go to
> console,
> and try to commit from there and look what will happen.
> didn't you commit for example from a different box before?
>
Yes, the first I found the problem was from Windows machine, I thought
LyX version contro
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> The typical message that appeared is attached. I keep on trying but always
> fail.
>
> For your info, I can checkin from PySVN Workbench (Ubuntu 10.04).
>
> Is this lyx problem, how to fix this problem?
there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:28:07PM -0500, BH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:43:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> >> Le 12 nov. 10 à 22:34, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >> >Without any preference set or command line sw
I have encountered a problem in using LyX version control (Check in changes).
I did many times previously to directly checkin changes (from within
LyX 1.6.7) to my lyx project in googlecode SVN repository.
Since yesterday It does not work any more. Other submenus (checkout,
update, revert, show
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > polyglossia stuff is planned on the top of it?
>
> Yes, this is the prerequisite for polyglossia support.
nice
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> polyglossia stuff is planned on the top of it?
Yes, this is the prerequisite for polyglossia support.
I'll post a polished patch later, where I resolved the remaining issues.
Jürgen
21 matches
Mail list logo
