> OK, so I'll try to fix the remaining part of #6985 before.
This and all other multirow-related bugs are now fixed so that I put it in.
regards Uwe
hi,
i moved .po files which were newer in branch to trunk.
once beta1 is out i will write .po maintainers to start work on 2.0
translations.
since there will be more often remerges in trunk now and we dont have compatible
generators, i would like to ask you to delegate the remerges on me.
if i'm
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> README:
>
> we state to support
> - windows 2000
> - mac os 10.2
At best we support MacOS 10.4.
BH
README:
we state to support
- windows 2000
- mac os 10.2
thats still true?
pave;
fans of cmake,
could you please check that the file INSTALL.cmake is up-to-date?
thanks,
pavel
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Hi there,
> My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
> by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
> to it right now.
> Anyway, I need to install development stuff. I've down
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Otherwise I don't have any open VCS issue which fits 2.0 for now.
> The Additional manual needs "accept changes" but not only mine.
i let it there, so somebody could check the english, but since
we have beautiful compare with revision history, anybody can
find it later. so we
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I would still like to move renamebuffer from guiview to buffer.
Vincent this is the last item before freeze, which i would be happy
to announce tomorrow night - if possible.
pavel
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
to it right now.
Anyway, I need to install development stuff. I've downloaded latest XCode
and Qt SDK. Now I need to know if I'd better us
The attached seems to work for that bug, but I haven't tested
extensively as I don't use Bibitems myself. Still, the approach seems
right, and possible, since the updateBuffer() call is now from one place.
As I mention in the bug report, though, there are some other issues that
remain.
Ric
On 11/06/2010 01:42 PM, uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: uwestoehr
Date: Sat Nov 6 18:42:26 2010
New Revision: 36165
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36165
Log:
lyx_2_0.py:
- remove 2 fixmes; we can be sure that there is space between the table entries
- add comment for the preamble that
Am 06.11.2010 um 15:51 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 06.11.2010 um 14:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> most probably you want some changes in wiki too.
>
>
> I tried to locate in wiki what you mention - but failed.
> Do you refer to wiki.lyx.org? What should I look up?
Ah, I
Le 06/11/2010 01:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
I've sent a note to JMarc asking a few questions. Once I'm absolutely sure
what I need to do, then it will be fairly quick.
i will be really happy if we can freeze this sunday. any news from this front?
I committed the code from Richard after a small
Am 06.11.2010 um 14:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Thank you, better indeed.
>>
>> I made an attempt to really compute a SVN::isRevertWithConfirmation() result.
>> I used "svn status" to substitute "svn diff" - this should be cheaper.
>> The isModified() helper method can be use
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Thank you, better indeed.
>
> I made an attempt to really compute a SVN::isRevertWithConfirmation() result.
> I used "svn status" to substitute "svn diff" - this should be cheaper.
> The isModified() helper method can be used for
> SVN::isCheckInWithConfirmation() too.
>
>
Am 06.11.2010 um 13:32 schrieb sa...@lyx.org:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Sat Nov 6 13:32:47 2010
> New Revision: 36162
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36162
>
> Log:
> Comment
Thank you, better indeed.
I made an attempt to really compute a SVN::isRevertWithConfirmation() result.
I used "
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Patch 2 implements "Compare with older revision" for CVS... ok?
ok
pavel
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.11.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
> > Am 06.11.2010 um 03:21 schrieb sa...@lyx.org:
> >
> >> Author: sanda
> >> Date: Sat Nov 6 03:21:04 2010
> >> New Revision: 36153
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36153
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> Fix RCS part of #6396.
Am 06.11.2010 um 03:44 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 06.11.2010 um 03:21 schrieb sa...@lyx.org:
>
>> Author: sanda
>> Date: Sat Nov 6 03:21:04 2010
>> New Revision: 36153
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36153
>>
>> Log:
>> Fix RCS part of #6396. Btw revert is slightly broken now...
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
