Am 06.11.2010 um 14:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Thank you, better indeed. >> >> I made an attempt to really compute a SVN::isRevertWithConfirmation() result. >> I used "svn status" to substitute "svn diff" - this should be cheaper. >> The isModified() helper method can be used for >> SVN::isCheckInWithConfirmation() too. >> >> Does this make sense? > > i was reconciled with the fact revert confirmation remains as it was since the > whole machinery looks like a bloat. it makes sense with committing which you > use ten times a day, but i can hardly remember when i used reversal. also when > using it i always want to see diff, so going to commandline anyway... > > secondly i guess that you can't use svn status without parsing (non empty != > modified)
Yes. This I had in mind already - svn status "?" for example. > its output so it maybe cheaper in terms of CPU but not in code complexity. Ok. I'll drop it then. Otherwise I don't have any open VCS issue which fits 2.0 for now. The Additional manual needs "accept changes" but not only mine. > most probably you want some changes in wiki too. I tried to locate in wiki what you mention - but failed. Do you refer to wiki.lyx.org? What should I look up? For the time after 2.0 release: In addition to the SystemCall and refactoring stuff I think "Register" can be improved. The "Register" operation does not register child documents, images et al. I'd like to propose to let "Register" open a dialog with * the opportunity to choose the backend for initial use and avoid using RCS blindly * a list of document components (children, etc) to add to the register operation * the option to control locking/reserved checkout You may have your plans too - I only wanted to mention my idea. Stephan
