Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

Am 26.07.2010 um 23:10 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? >> >> I don't understand the idea of the lookup of a configure option in a file >> with unknown location. >> Possibly, there sh

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I cannot get it to work with Skim. Is it possible to simplify the setting? > > I don't understand the idea of the lookup of a configure option in a file > with unknown location. > Possibly, there should be another way to interlink LyX and vie

Re: Patch for binding on Mac again

Am 22.07.2010 um 23:17 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 22.07.2010 um 21:50 schrieb BH: > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:49:35PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 22.07.2010 um 15:03 schrieb BH: > A further simple change you might

Re: Patch to introduce LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE

Am 26.07.2010 um 16:29 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 26.07.2010 um 16:24 schrieb BH: > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> You applied the patch from today? But alpha5 is wrong too, I guess. >> >> Yes, and yes. >> >>> There is an error in the patch in src/support/Apple

Re: Lyx 2.0alpha5 and texlive 2010

Miguel, > When I use texlive 2010 with lyx 2.0alpha5, can not preview the document > koma-script style in ps format, only in pdf(Xetex). By my work is a problem, > because I need ps format. I have removed ptex and platex in the texlive > 2010, and all work fine. In the texlive 2009 installation, n

Lyx 2.0alpha5 and texlive 2010

Hi all : When I use texlive 2010 with lyx 2.0alpha5, can not preview the document koma-script style in ps format, only in pdf(Xetex). By my work is a problem, because I need ps format. I have removed ptex and platex in the texlive 2010, and all work fine. In the texlive 2009 installation, no

Re: Patch to introduce LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE

Am 26.07.2010 um 16:24 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> You applied the patch from today? But alpha5 is wrong too, I guess. > > Yes, and yes. > >> There is an error in the patch in src/support/AppleSpeller.m :( >> It slipped in when adding the runtime che

Re: Patch to introduce LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > You applied the patch from today? But alpha5 is wrong too, I guess. Yes, and yes. > There is an error in the patch in src/support/AppleSpeller.m :( > It slipped in when adding the runtime check for OS 10.4. > Today I've fixed it... sorry. >

Re: Patch to introduce LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE

Am 26.07.2010 um 15:20 schrieb BH: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> I've prepared a patch to give the user the opportunity to revert the >> LFUN_SPELLING_ADD operation. >> Currently, the implementation adds real functionality for apples native >> spellchecker only. >> A

Re: Patch to introduce LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > I've prepared a patch to give the user the opportunity to revert the > LFUN_SPELLING_ADD operation. > Currently, the implementation adds real functionality for apples native > spellchecker only. > AFAICS, the aspell library can support some

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Default is in almost all classes, except of the presentation classes, "10". Well, at least for the KOMA classes, it is "11". I'm sure there are many more variations if you go through the hundreds of classes available at CTAN. Jürgen

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Anyway, if you're too lazy to do this, I opt for limiting \baselineskip > > to vspace only (and maybe add other access points later). > > I cannot agree to this. LyX is not there to tell the user what to use. We > should provide what LaTeX provides. We therefore already provi

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

On 07/26/2010 08:56 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 26.07.2010 14:45, schrieb Richard Heck: The class the defines the possible font sizes. You specify the font size in the document settings. But one option is "default", i.e., not to specify it. How do you know what that means? Default is in almost

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

Am 26.07.2010 14:45, schrieb Richard Heck: The class the defines the possible font sizes. You specify the font size in the document settings. But one option is "default", i.e., not to specify it. How do you know what that means? Default is in almost all classes, except of the presentation

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

Am 26.07.2010 08:02, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: But all insets have different syntax. That would mean that I have to write a detection routine foe every inst. E.g. when I find baselineskip in a box I need to revert the whole box as TeX-code. This is a horror. I think this can be done. We hav

Re: [patch] support for \\\\baselineskip

On 07/25/2010 08:55 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 26.07.2010 00:32, schrieb Richard Heck: That's why I wrote in 90%. Usually you have single line space and nearly all document classes use 1.2 for the baselineskip then. I thought the worry was that there is no way to determine the fontsize. If it's

Re: Beta plans (again)

Am 21.07.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > hi, > > as usual after release i repost planned features, Richard's plate slowly > disappeating, nice... > > the other stuff is not moving and i have been thinking that we should > highlight most important > tasks because while many things would be