configure.py [patch] for branch

2009-10-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
The following path is needed for configure.py to make eLyXer working properly. OK to go in? (It is already in trunk for some weeks.) regards Uwe Index: configure.py === --- configure.py (revision 31668) +++ configure.py (working cop

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 07:56:12PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:42:30PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > > > On 10/18/2009 01:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > rgheck wrote: > > > > > >> I like this approach. It's clean, an the master_language param may be > > >> us

Re: gcc warnings

2009-10-18 Thread Steve Litt
On Sunday 18 October 2009 16:31:04 Pavel Sanda wrote: > i'm not sure whether we should fix, but gcc 4.3 with monolithic build gives > those warnings: I'm writing the following as a user, not a developer... I'm a huge fan of -Wall producing no warnings. That way I know I got a clean compile, and

gcc warnings

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
i'm not sure whether we should fix, but gcc 4.3 with monolithic build gives those warnings: In file included from liblyxqt4.cpp:79: GuiView.cpp:168: warning: 'lyx::frontend::GuiView::GuiViewPrivate' has a field 'lyx::frontend::GuiView::GuiViewPrivate::bg_widget_' whose type uses the anonymous n

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: >> could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ? >> perhaps adding some senction would be enough. >> >> pavel > > > Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know > C++-compiling so I don't put in too many unnecessary flags.

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 okt 2009, at 19.40, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is stil

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:42:30PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > On 10/18/2009 01:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > rgheck wrote: > > > >> I like this approach. It's clean, an the master_language param may be > >> useful for something else. > >> > > +1. > > > > > That said, do we actuall

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread rgheck
On 10/18/2009 01:04 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: rgheck wrote: I like this approach. It's clean, an the master_language param may be useful for something else. +1. That said, do we actually need the param? Or can we just get this from Buffer::masterBuffer()->params().language()

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: > So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions > were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. > Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is still > there, but deselecting the choice of back

Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
Hi all, I have just upgraded to 10.6 and thought I shared some experiences on compiling: For Qt you need the 4.6.0-beta1 version (4.5 might work, but 10.6 seems to be only partially supported; also, if we look cross-platform, I think 4.6 is needed for Windows 7). Download from: http://ge

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
rgheck wrote: > I like this approach. It's clean, an the master_language param may be > useful for something else. +1. Jürgen

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread rgheck
On 10/18/2009 11:45 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:37:42AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch fixes the bug for me, but I have no idea if it is correct in a CJK environment. It looks correct, but of course so

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:37:42AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The attached patch fixes the bug for me, but I have no idea if it is > > correct in a CJK environment. > > It looks correct, but of course some testing will not harm. We know how > sensitive this a

Re: Weird Language Bug

2009-10-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch fixes the bug for me, but I have no idea if it is > correct in a CJK environment. It looks correct, but of course some testing will not harm. We know how sensitive this area is. Jürgen

Re: Thank you for your efforts and a few ideas

2009-10-18 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/18/09, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > 3. Tikz now has wonderful capabilities for various aspects which improve > the > > end results but it is a bit of a pain for those who are not into > > programming. Is there any possibility this could be integrated in to some > > degree.. > > This won't be po