I noticed a problem with the spellchecker today.
while spellchecking, the spellchecker suddenly failed
with a message that there were no dictionary
for the de_DE language.
The document was in Norwegian, with some English terms
here and there. On closer examination, there were
indeed a German word
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:29:04AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> +///
>> +/// An internal buffer does not contain a real document, but some
>> auxiliary text segment.
>> +/// It is not associated with a filename, it is never saved, thus it
>> does not need to be
>> +///
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:35:09AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>> I did expect. Actually I listed a long list of LFUNS in LyXFunc which
>> should work on the document buffer long ago. After this, only the
>> calls to view() have been altered and Abdel di
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Still, there would be cases where the design is important, say, in
books. If a book (or any other work, say, a poster) was
designed/created with LyX and the author wants to give credit, it
would be nice for her to have an out-of-box solution.
I cited L
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Tommaso,
Would you please post this kind of patches before
committing. I thought we have been very clear by now.
Don't be surprised when I start reverting your
commits when I don't like them.
Well, on this particular issue, I think we discussed
it las
Hello
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> anyway i didnt get why is this needed... you just can setup your window in the
> max height and desired width.
>
This is a feature that I intended to suggest, but Richard was quicker
with his e-mail. As I see it, such an option can be usef
>> That's no problem, that is how it is supposed to be. That's why I
gave
>> the example of the GuiCommandBuffer, which doesn't toggle if the
focus
>> is on the bufferView.
>
>which means introducing new lfun just for the sake of having shortcut
in menu. hrm.
>pavel
>
I don't know whether it is
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> That's no problem, that is how it is supposed to be. That's why I gave
> the example of the GuiCommandBuffer, which doesn't toggle if the focus
> is on the bufferView.
which means introducing new lfun just for the sake of having shortcut
in menu. hrm.
pavel
>> this won't do thing you want, since now being inside document
>> with already opened search dock and presing C-S-f instead of
>> geting focus
>> into search dock, search dock disappear ;) pavel
>>
> You should do the same as for GuiCommandBuffer I guess..
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> this won't do thing you want, since now being inside document with
> already opened search dock and presing C-S-f instead of geting
> focus
> into search dock, search dock disappear ;) pavel
>
> >>> You should do the same as for GuiComm
this won't do thing you want, since now being inside document with
already opened search dock and presing C-S-f instead of geting
focus
into search dock, search dock disappear ;) pavel
>>> You should do the same as for GuiCommandBuffer I guess..
>>
>> I would rather say lik
>> Tommaso,
>>
>> Would you please post this kind of patches before
>> committing. I thought we have been very clear by now.
>> Don't be surprised when I start reverting your
>> commits when I don't like them.
>
>Well, on this particular issue, I think we discussed
>it last week Vincent.
>
Well
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> tomm...@lyx.org schreef:
>>> Author: tommaso
>>> Date: Tue Sep 8 03:29:07 2009
>>> New Revision: 31340
>>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31340
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Tommaso,
>>
>> Would you please post this kind of patches before comm
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> this won't do thing you want, since now being inside document with
>>> already opened search dock
>>> and presing C-S-f instead of geting focus into search dock, search dock
>>> disappear ;)
>>> pavel
>>>
>> You should do the same as for GuiCommandBuffer I guess..
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
tomm...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: tommaso
Date: Tue Sep 8 03:29:07 2009
New Revision: 31340
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31340
Tommaso,
Would you please post this kind of patches before committing. I
thought we have been very clear by now. Don't be
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
Hi developers,
I find long equations going off-screen. This also happens with many of my
equation labels and a horizontal scroll bar would help glimpse what is
off-screen.
Another existing solution is to zoom out the work area in order to show
the full equation:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: tommaso
Date: Wed Sep 9 00:11:13 2009
New Revision: 31354
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31354
Log:
Fix visualization of keyboard short-cut in Edit menu for toggling
Advanced Find and Replace panel.
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
> would allow extension of the latter beyond screen limits. But if this is a
> small issue, can this be considered as a feature for a future release?
already in bugzilla and i dont think its a small issue.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
... continuing ...
In LyXFunc::dispatch():
L950:
case LFUN_BUILD_PROGRAM:
LASSERT(lyx_view_ && buffer, /**/);
buffer->doExport("program", true);
break;
case LFUN_BUFFER_CHKTEX:
L
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Or, I am missing something, or we can move masses of these LFUNS.
this was long time plan but nobody went for this mass movement of
lfuns into the correct dispatch hierarchy level...
Well, you say that b
20 matches
Mail list logo
