Trunk Won't Run in F11

This is a fresh install of F11, and I've done a fresh checkout of the tree, too. When I try to run trunk (in place, as I've not installed it), I get a segfault. Thus: #0 __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach_single (this=0x1529f00) at ../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/debug.cc:246 #1 0

Re: #4832: missing converter dialog gives no information about originating format

LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: > #4832: missing converter dialog gives no information about originating format > > Comment: > > this does not look like the cause. can you give us some recipe how to > reproduce your problem? > I think perhaps the case where this arose could have been be from documen

Re: Automake 1.11 and Branch

On 07/11/2009 05:29 PM, rgheck wrote: Can someone update branch to automake 1.11? I can't build anymore I know this was done for trunk. Actually, on looking, the patch is trivial. I can do it if it's OK, Jurgen. rh

Automake 1.11 and Branch

Can someone update branch to automake 1.11? I can't build anymore I know this was done for trunk. rh

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs: 5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458, 5944, 5948 ? Yes. Please post the patches subsequently. Jürgen Pat

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs: 5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458, 5944, 5948 ? Yes. Please post the patches subsequently. Jürgen Pat

Re: [patch] fix bug 4128: branches cannot be renamed

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > - press rename > - do nothing but press Cancel > > Result: An error dialog is shown telling that the branch couldn't be > renamed. But by pressing cancel I wouldn't have it to be renamed. Should be fixed. Thanks. Jürgen

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Patch for bug 3706. OK. Jürgen

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Patch for bug 2034. Go. Jürgen

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Do I really have to post all the patches. This will triple the time to > do it. I believe that for most bugs, the fix is small and the > corresponding revision is mentioned in the bug itself. If possible, please. Looking at all the revisions is a lot of work for me,

Re: [patch] fix longtable bug 6057

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I understand. So your patch is the right solution. I'm gonna revert my > patch in trunk so that you can apply your patch. Thanks. I'll do that later. Jürgen

Re: [patch] support for table alignment

Astonishingly, the code for the table alignment was already in our source code, but without an UI connection. This code was written by Vincent in fileformat change 346. Yes, I know. I added menu items and a context menu item for the table. Vincent

Re: [patch] support for table alignment

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: LyX doesn't yet support - to top- or bottom-align tables (http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6068) - to left- or right-align longtables (http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4134) The attached patch adds these features. I've put it in. I would nevertheless get some feedback about th

Re: For branch ?

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs: 5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458, 5944, 5948 ? Yes. Please post the patches subsequently. Jürgen Patch for bug 3706. Vincent Index:

Re: For branch ?

Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs: 5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458, 5944, 5948 ? Yes. Please post the patches subsequently. Patch for bug

Re: For branch ?

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Can I start backporting the fixes for the following bugs: 5998, 2034, 2213, 3706, 3918, 4177, 4509, 4952, 5390, 5435, 5458, 5944, 5948 ? Yes. Please post the patches subsequently. Jürgen Do I really have to post all the p

Re: [patch] fix bug 4128: branches cannot be renamed

>> - when I press rename, the dialog should display me the current name >> highlighted (The same way of the filename when you use Save As) because one >> often only wants to add some characters or delete some. This also fixes the >> case when you press rename, do nothing and press OK. > > fixed.

Re: [patch] fix longtable bug 6057

>> then we need to set the checkbox for the >> first header when adding a caption. > > But that generates different output: > > \caption[Example Phone List]{Example Phone List\label{tab:DiffCaptions}} > \endfirsthead > vs. > \caption[Example Phone List]{Example Phone List\label{tab:DiffCaptions}}

Re: Keytest: Screenshots of Crashes, Samples and Patch.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >> Would keycodes be useful for submitting manual bugs as well? > > > > > > some links to keys is a must. most of the bugs wouldn't be reachible > just from > > > the bakctrace and screenshot. > > > > I mean bugs that are manually found. I

Re: [patch] fix bug 4128: branches cannot be renamed

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > A more annoying problem is that your existing code only iterates over > top-level insets. And this is at the price of code that is more > complicated than a forwardInset-based one. I have now rewritten both the branch rename method and getUsedBranches() to use an Ins