On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:11:06PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> Attached a patch which enables the output until the process is running.
>
> Also having "nul" as output file on Windows prohibits the start of the
> process.
I fixed the problem with "nul", however I do not agree with the rest
of
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:10:22PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> And I think our problem had to do with using it for something it may not
> really have been intended for, or at least not realizing that checking
> to make sure two filenames really do point to the same file is going to
> have to requ
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:11:06PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Attached a patch which enables the output until the process is running.
>
> Also having "nul" as output file on Windows prohibits the start of the
> process.
> Should it be complete diasbles if output is 'nul'.
Yes, I should have t
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Does it support non-blocking latex processing?
> >> And this has nothing to do with Windows.
> >> And aren't you the cygwin guy, using neit
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:15:52AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> svn: warning: '>' is not under version control
>> svn: '/trash/lyx_tmpdir.T15450' is not a working copy
>> svn: Can't open file '/trash/lyx_tmpdir.T15450/.svn/entries': No such file
>> or directory
>
> Shou
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
wrote:
In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a
possible development environment to automate my business, so it
would
be good to know before I make the same mistake.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Does it support non-blocking latex processing?
>> And this has nothing to do with Windows.
>> And aren't you the cygwin guy, using neither Windows nor Linux?
>
> Someone disabled the QProcess patch because
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
wrote:
> >> In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a
> >> possible development environment to automate my business, so it
> >> would
>
> >> be good to know before I make the same mistake.
> >>
> >T
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:15:52AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> svn: warning: '>' is not under version control
> svn: '/trash/lyx_tmpdir.T15450' is not a working copy
> svn: Can't open file '/trash/lyx_tmpdir.T15450/.svn/entries': No such file or
> directory
Should be fixed now.
--
Enrico
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller
wrote:
> James C. Sutherland wrote:
>
>> However, I really don't want to have any notion of
>> the "language" my documents are written in.
>
> This will have the consequence that your text, even if monolingually
> English,
>
> * will not be hyphe
Dear LyX developers (especially John Levon & Lars Gullik Bjønnes I think),
I have noticed that the when current LyX (1.6.2) reads and writes a document
containing multiple authors for tracked changes it re-orders the Author
List. For example if Andy and Bert are both working on a document, when An
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 04:45:04 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a
> > possible development environment to automate my business, so it would be
> > good to know before I make the same mistake.
>
> Please define
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> Maybe, it's not fair to blame Qt. Maybe, the problem was how we use(d)
> it.
Stockholm syndrome?
--
Enrico
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a
possible development environment to automate my business, so it would
be good to know before I make the same mistake.
This was partly a joke, but had a real source. We w
>> In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a
>> possible development environment to automate my business, so it would
>> be good to know before I make the same mistake.
>>
>>
>This was partly a joke, but had a real source. We were QFile to do
various
>filesystem-relat
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 06:39:01 pm Richard Heck wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 03:20:17 pm Edwin Leuven wrote:
enrico wrote:
The gcc compiler is available natively on Windows at
http://www.mingw.org/
i think the qt install
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:15:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> If you use Windows or *nix (maybe also Mac) there should be no problems.
Linux
> If you use something else, I find that the last usable version of Qt
> is 4.2.3.
--
Enrico
Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-05-13, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Generally, my impression is that LyX 1.6 was in a much better shape than 1.5
from the beginning, and I think it's a pretty good release, given all the
changes it introduced.
LyX 1.6 was the first release that crashed on a r
On 2009-05-13, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Was the overuse of Qt the reason so many people seem to be having crashes
>>> and slowdowns with LyX 1.6.x?
>> No, the reason is that more people use and report problems. And of
>> course people tends to forget the problems w
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:45:04AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
>> In what ways were you using too much of it? I'm considering Qt as a possible
>> development environment to automate my business, so it would be good to know
>> before I make the same mistake.
If you use Windo
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Was the overuse of Qt the reason so many people seem to be having crashes
>> and slowdowns with LyX 1.6.x?
>>
>
> No, the reason is that more people use and report problems. And of
> course people tends to forget the problems with initial releases once
> they use a st
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 06:39:01 pm Richard Heck wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 03:20:17 pm Edwin Leuven wrote:
enrico wrote:
The gcc compiler is available natively on Windows at
http://www.mingw.org/
i think the qt install
22 matches
Mail list logo
