Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries.
OK, I see now that this seems to be intentional. Trac distinguishes ticket
type ("enhancements" and "defects") from Severity. Having the Severity
(perhaps instead of the unused Priority) in the table/summa
Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Well, it least I uploaded it. It's not yet visible on
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2
>
> Could you try to upload again? There is still nothing there.
I definitely see it on the server while I'm logged in. Jean-Marc, do you have
an idea?
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries. Furthermore,
the "fixedinbranch" and "fixedintrunk" keywords seems to have got lost on
transformation. This is crucial.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
> When I try a File|Import|Latex (plain) with the simple file
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{document}
> \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:scalinglnlambda}
> A & = & B \nonumber \\
> & = & C\end{eqnarray}
> \end{document}
This is the same with LyX 1.6.2. Can you please
Since http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28858/ formulas can no longer be imported to LyX. The reason
is that in math.cpp the routine
bool is_math_env(string const & name)
{
return known_math_environments.find(name) !=
known_math_environments.end();
}
now always gives false. I'm not abl
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
- all the links to bugs we have in comments in our code are lost
Bullshit.
OK, as I wasn't informed that bugzilla is only temporarily down.
- users that report bugs cannot set people to CC and set its own bug as
duplicate
- I cannot assigns bugs to me or certai
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
Because you have not volunteered to do any work... I think I got exactly
zero response about my request for some help with bugzilla.
I missed that. What can I do to help you? When you can give me the existing bugzilla database, I
will try to set it up to a new bug
>
> > - bugs are no longer OS specific
>
> Is that a blocker issue, or can it be done f.ex. with keywords.
>
This can be done with custom fields.
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracTicketsCustomFields
> - there are no longer default bug owners for certain components (I e.g. was
>> the default b
The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
There are still some missing configuration that can be done, and I have not
setup any
authorization or authentication yet.
--
Lgb
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you wi
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> Yep lots of not very nice code in this area; there's also some
> function which are duplicates (egg isLetter()). I am trying to set up
> the infrastructure right before going into bug fixing mode.
Fine :)
JMarc
On 29/03/2009 22:23, rgheck wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Mar 29 21:57:30 2009
New Revision: 28973
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28973
@@ -268,6 +269,7 @@
+spellcheck_continuously = false;
Everything else is OK, and this is more than OK. ;-)
Oh I am not
On 29/03/2009 23:03, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Log:
Transfer some general code from GuiSpellchecker to Buffer and
DocIterator.
* Buffer::nextWord(): new method to search for next word.
* DocIterator.cpp: new function isLetter() moved from GuiSpellchecker.
I like your changes and appreciate
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
JMarc
Log:
Transfer some general code from GuiSpellchecker to Buffer and
DocIterator.
* Buffer::nextWord(): new method to search for next word.
* DocIterator.cpp: new function isLetter() moved from GuiSpellchecker.
I like your changes and appreciate that they are done in understandable
chunks. Not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do not
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-dev
Concerning transportation: We usually meet in Europe. Europeans can
by cheap flights for even 100 € two ways.
But when Richard and Bo want to join use, they cannot buy such
cheap flights, so when we have 300 € for
transportation I think it is fair to give them the money. (Just a
thought.)
I
Le 29 mars 09 à 03:27, Edwin Leuven a écrit :
you can already be proud of yourself, the speed and competence with
which you have made yourself
familiar with lyx internals is impressive.
Indeed.
JMarc
Some other way of providing files like that must be provided. (Or
perhaps
just the regular way: ftp)
But this means people will need some kind of accounts, right?
This is indeed a feature we need.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do so
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Mar 29 21:57:30 2009
New Revision: 28973
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28973
@@ -268,6 +269,7 @@
+ spellcheck_continuously = false;
Everything else is OK, and this is more than OK. ;-)
rh
>What we (as a community) want to see in exchange is a new, major
and well
>written feature be added to LyX. This is then a fair exchange IMHO.
But it is not a given that we will get that :-)
Indeed. Now the (moral) contract is between Abdel and the rest of the
team :)
JMarc
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Thanks, it's on the server.
Well, it least I uploaded it. It's not yet visible on
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2
Could you try to upload again? There is still nothing there.
Joost
> The major question I have is why we haven't simply upgraded our bugzilla to
> a recent version and be ready?
>
Because "We" are not doing any work by itself...
>
> Concerning Trac:
> - Trac lists every change made, therefore we have now bug reports where we
> have 13 entries, but 9 of them wit
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 18:22, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Cool down, Uwe. Lars is only migrating the database.
>
> But my question was why it is necessary to migrate from bugzilla to Trac?
> Or did I only missed some mails from the list? I hope that we can can go
> back to bugzilla or another suitable
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Cool down, Uwe. Lars is only migrating the database.
>
> But my question was why it is necessary to migrate from bugzilla to Trac?
> Or did I only missed some mails from the list?
Possibly the thread "The New Trac", where the whole procedure has been
announced and described
> Cool down, Uwe. Lars is only migrating the database.
But my question was why it is necessary to migrate from bugzilla to Trac? Or did I only missed some
mails from the list? I hope that we can can go back to bugzilla or another suitable bug tracking
system after the migration.
> Bugzilla is
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I see now, what is happening there? I see that Trac contains now the bug
> reports, but why was this change made? Two weeks ago Lars asked about the
> change and I opted against Trac when the old bugzilla infos are no longer
> available and when Trac doesn't provide some key feat
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
>> Can you please report this bug it at bugzilla.lyx.or
>
which is currently not available though
I see now, what is happening there? I see that Trac contains now the bug reports, but why was this
change made? Two weeks ago Lars asked about the change and I
This is the same with LyX 1.6.2. Can you please report this bug it at
bugzilla.lyx.org?
which is currently not available though
> I'm using Lyx 1.6.1 (didn't find the standard Windows installer for
> 1.6.2) on Win XP SP3.
Why not using the other installer? Every installer installs a full featured LyX.
> When I try a File|Import|Latex (plain) with the simple file
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{document}
> \b
On 29/03/2009 17:43, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think the sponsorship as such is ok, and your handling of the issue
is ok, and covered by the results of the last discussion of the topic.
Good, thanks for your support.
Abdel.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:07:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
> years thanks to your paypal
>
> > > account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
> >
> > This is an important issue. We for example had to pay
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 07:56:45PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 28/03/2009 19:40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> >> As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
>> work on lyx, that
>> >> place some requirements on the LyX Project.
>> >
>> > Well, I am part of the LyX project and
On 28/03/2009 21:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
More seriously, the money is all yours if you implement the feature.
I'll add your name in the table now if you want.
Sign me up...
You're in. I've let my name for the time being because that's my paypal
account and I'd like to follow what y
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:10:35PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
>>> Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
>>>
>>> The LyX Users:
>>> United States16.2%
>>> Germany13.5%
>>> Sweden6.9%
>
> Man, I must have spent a lot of time on the lyx
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
> case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
> part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do so.
> (Of course, th
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I don't understand why there would be an extra new line after the '?>',
nor do I get an extra line when I try running the script, so what gives?
Maybe because I just fixed it? ;-)
Thanks,
Christian
http://www.lyx.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sure we have a bugs that would benefit from a OS field, but that can be
> noted in
> decsription and comments as well.
Sure.
Jürgen
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > However, AFAICS trac does not feature "Platform" and "OS"
> specifications.
> > > Will
> > > this (IMO important) data be lost after the transformation? And are you
> > > aware
> > > of other data types th
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > However, AFAICS trac does not feature "Platform" and "OS" specifications.
> > Will
> > this (IMO important) data be lost after the transformation? And are you
> > aware
> > of other data types that are not supported?
>
> Yes, some info will be lost, other info move fr
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:49, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
> > 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more
> fixups
> > and workarounds.
> >
> > I really hope the end r
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Thanks, it's on the server.
Well, it least I uploaded it. It's not yet visible on
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.2
Jürgen
Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Could you drop the installers to
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming ?
>
> They should be there.
Thanks, it's on the server. I'm just adapting the download page.
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
> 1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more fixups
> and workarounds.
>
> I really hope the end result will be acceptable.
On a first glance, the intermediate result loo
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I don't understand why there would be an extra new line after the '?>',
> nor do I get an extra line when I try running the script, so what gives?
Maybe because I just fixed it? ;-)
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28953
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28954
Jürg
Hi,
I'm using Lyx 1.6.1 (didn't find the standard Windows installer for
1.6.2) on Win XP SP3.
When I try a File|Import|Latex (plain) with the simple file
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:scalinglnlambda}
A & = & B \nonumber \\
& = & C\e
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 20:27, Christian Ridderström <
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to get the user 'www-data' from 'lyx.org', 'www.lyx.org' or '
> lyx.lyx.org' approved for sending messages to lyx-docs. How do I get this
> done?
>
> The wiki and the web site can send n
49 matches
Mail list logo
