Uwe St??hr wrote:
> MiKTeX updates the XeTeX version evey month,
> while TeXLive will only do this once a year. This could make problems.
I don't think this is true. Binary packages are regularly updated via the
TeXLive manager.
>> Moving to XeTeX would increase the potential user base of LyX a
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:49:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It would be this patch (again not tested). I'd appreciate if people
>> using windows and mac os could test these two patches.
>
> Both patches work on cygwin.
Thanks for testin
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:49:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It would be this patch (again not tested). I'd appreciate if people
> using windows and mac os could test these two patches.
Both patches work on cygwin.
--
Enrico
Georg Baum wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Thu Oct 2 16:41:07 2008
New Revision: 26683
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26683
Log:
Simplify the mover semantics a bit further: The extra variable being
passed in the deleted functions was never actually used, and it
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Do I now get your OK?
in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.
You don't have to. It is just another layout file from me (my 5th). So
its structure and template is the same for my other layouts for other
journals.
If you say
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:10:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Only in some special cases a distinction needs to be made, and
> > --without-x seems to be the appropriate configure switch for making
> > this distinction in sources outside of
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Configuration works independently from --without-x (i.e., using or not
> this switch doesn't matter).
OK, all is done via pkg-config, then.
> On cygwin, Qt can be built either using X11 as a graphics backend or
> without it.
This I knew.
> Only
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:47:34AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> > but I have a problem on Cygwin. With this patch, X_DISPLAY_MISSING
> >> > is not defined in config.h
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But before we can do this, we need a Russian to set up the Russian main
Wiki page. Other wise you still have to go the the English Wiki and then
by the hyperlink to the Russian version. But this is only possible when
you already know English. So we have to find a way to provide
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am sure André will correct that.
but I am not sure it will make the code shorter.
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or maybe createApplication? We have basically to replicate the pruning
>> code in easyParse, right?
>
> Yes, good idea.
It would be this patch (again not tested). I'd appreciate if people
using windows and mac os could test these two patches.
JMarc
On 08/10/2008 12:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This code is only useful for the Clipboard, which is in frontend anyway.
We have reliable way to check twhat we want in the frontend. For
example, the code above is wrong in the Mac/X11 case.
T
On 08/10/2008 12:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No, just let GuiApplication ctor handle argc and argv directly, no
need for an additional virutal interface IMO.
Or maybe createApplication? We have basically to replicate the pruning
code
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, just let GuiApplication ctor handle argc and argv directly, no
> need for an additional virutal interface IMO.
Or maybe createApplication? We have basically to replicate the pruning
code in easyParse, right?
JMarc
On 08/10/2008 11:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With this patch, X_DISPLAY_MISSING is not defined in config.h and this
is used in a couple of places in the code for distinguishing between
Qt4/X11 and Qt4/Win Cygwin builds.
I took a look
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This code is only useful for the Clipboard, which is in frontend anyway.
> We have reliable way to check twhat we want in the frontend. For
> example, the code above is wrong in the Mac/X11 case.
>
> This code should go to frontends/qt4/qt_helpers.
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll have a look at it. Do you know how to forward mails from a
> lyx.org address to another mailbox? I need to have some way to
> separate Bugzilla mail from other messages.
You need to create a file named .forward in you home account on
aussie.lyx.org.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The mail address I'm using for this list should work. What error did
you get when trying to reach > me?
Nothing, I just never got any reply.
Weird. Except for the messages of today and yesterday and one message
you CCed about the dependency package, I did not receive any
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With this patch, X_DISPLAY_MISSING is not defined in config.h and this
> is used in a couple of places in the code for distinguishing between
> Qt4/X11 and Qt4/Win Cygwin builds.
I took a look at these two uses of X_DISPLAY_MISSING and they look
high
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >- for example there is no reason to have embedded objects manual to
> > have separated. i also wonder whats the reason for extended manual
> > to be separated.
> Because they are not of interest for average users. They are designed
> to explain the thin
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:47:34AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > but I have a problem on Cygwin. With this patch, X_DISPLAY_MISSING
>> > is not defined in config.h and this is used in a couple of places
>> > in the
>> > code for distinguis
21 matches
Mail list logo
