Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: kuemmel
Date: Thu Dec 13 22:57:37 2007
New Revision: 22137
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22137
Log:
cmake/merge: fix compile, this split conflicts with the others
So now we have to be careful not to use methods that have
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: kuemmel
Date: Thu Dec 13 22:57:37 2007
New Revision: 22137
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22137
Log:
cmake/merge: fix compile, this split conflicts with the others
So now we have to be careful not to use methods that have
> clipboard" button to log dialog http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21247 - uwestoehr -
InsetMathFrac: add support for \tbinom and \dbinom, fixes bug 4305
No.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21697 - uwestoehr - languages: fix activation of Spanish
characters (bug 4361)
This could be risky
Predrag Rakic schrieb:
Default Serbian alphabet is cyrillic. It is associated with locale code
sr_RS and iso8859-5 char map.
Also, there is latin Serbian alphabet. It is associated with locale code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and iso8859-2 char map.
I committed the line for "Serbian (Latin)" to SVN. Bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Thu Dec 13 22:57:37 2007
> New Revision: 22137
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22137
> Log:
> cmake/merge: fix compile, this split conflicts with the others
So now we have to be careful not to use methods that have the same
names of m
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:39:25PM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote:
>
> ... as usual :-)
>
> Michael
>
>
> Patch Candidate List #13
>
> Approved by Jürgen
> --
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20903 - ?? - initial support for
> shift + right-mouse-click selection. (TESTING RE
_gzopen gefunden.
In "support.lib(gzstream.obj)" referenziert
"QtCored4.lib(QtCored4.dll)" geladen
_gzclose gefunden.
In "support.lib(gzstream.obj)" referenziert
"QtCored4.lib(QtCored4.dll)" geladen
_gzread gefunden.
In "support.lib(gzstream.obj)" refer
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 13.12.2007 um 22:29 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Now that I got my Mac back from a repair I just ran into a link
problem (which I did not have with Linux earlier today):
lyx-qt4 is not linked against zlib (i.e. no -lz in the linker command
l
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:12:46AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > using 'namespace lyx::support' instead of the tens of 'using
>> > support::xxx'. I'll do that now.
>>
>> This is getting ridi
Hou, what a big commit log given by svk. sorry for the noise.
Stefan
Am 13.12.2007 um 22:40 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: sts
Date: Thu Dec 13 22:40:57 2007
New Revision: 22134
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22134
Log:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: sts | 2007-12-01 01:54:37 +0100
[EMAIL P
... as usual :-)
Michael
Patch Candidate List #13
Approved by Jürgen
--
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20903 - ?? - initial support
for shift + right-mouse-click selection. (TESTING REQUIRED)
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20916 - leuven - add "copy to
cli
Am 13.12.2007 um 22:29 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Now that I got my Mac back from a repair I just ran into a link
problem (which I did not have with Linux earlier today):
lyx-qt4 is not linked against zlib (i.e. no -lz in the linker
command line).
It seems that in m
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Now that I got my Mac back from a repair I just ran into a link problem
(which I did not have with Linux earlier today):
lyx-qt4 is not linked against zlib (i.e. no -lz in the linker command
line).
It seems that in my old checkout boost/iostreams forced zlib to
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>>> bool FileName::changePermission(unsigned long int mode) const
>>> {
>>> - if (!fname.isWritable()) {
>>> + if (!isWritable()) {
>>> LYXERR0("File " << *this << " is not writable!");
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
bool FileName::changePermission(unsigned long int mode) const
{
- if (!fname.isWritable()) {
+ if (!isWritable()) {
LYXERR0("File " << *this << " is not writable!");
return false;
}
When you are the file owner, you
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
without any need for the change. Every time something that is
working is changed, new bugs are introduced.
And much more old bugs are corrected.
So, you exchange an old know
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The two notion are pretty orthogonal. There are absolutely no
> > difference code wise. FWIW, I would be OK if we remove all nested
> > namespace and stay with one unique fla
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>> Actually, your patch disables the optimization of the bibfiles cache,
>> which means that opening the dialog needs very long when you have a big
>> bibliography database. Why is it required for \nocite anyway?
>
> Does it really? I was thinking I'd just be affecting the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Note that with the change from \batchmode to \nonstopmode the chance
of a stalled latex (and a hanging lyx) is high, because when a file
that should be included is not found, latex stops, expecting you to
enter a new file
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: forenr
Date: Wed Dec 12 19:25:53 2007
New Revision: 22101
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22101
Log:
Revert qprocess code. Revisions reverted: 22026, 22030, 22044, 22048,
22077, 22078, 22079, 22080, 22081.
Sorry Peter, but this w
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
However, I'd rather revert the changes because they don't solve any
problem (or those problems can be solved in other non-disruptive ways),
destabilize a
Am Samstag, den 08.12.2007, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Excellent. Note, however, that this is a file format change (because "nocite"
> has to be reverted to ERT). You'll have to increment the file format and
> provide a lyx2lyx function to revert nocite (which should be very easy).
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:43:35AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Thu Dec 13 11:43:29 2007
> New Revision: 22124
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22124
> Log:
> compile fix following undo/redo mixup. Sorry.
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/FileNa
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > without any need for the change. Every time something that is
> > working is changed, new bugs are introduced.
>
> And much more old bugs are corrected.
So, you exchange an old known bug, for which
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:29:01AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:12:46 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
> >> we decide to ignore it.
> >
> > W
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:23:09AM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:12:46 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
> > we decide to ignore it.
>
> What was the rationale for this decision?
For adding namespac
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:12:46AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > using 'namespace lyx::support' instead of the tens of 'using
> > support::xxx'. I'll do that now.
>
> This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Abdel wants to remove lines.
>
> Right, but that's only a side benefit. The primary objective was to
> remove the burden of fixing those superfluous lines each time some
> code is moved.
Maybe you move too much code ;)
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The two notion are pretty orthogonal. There are absolutely no
> difference code wise. FWIW, I would be OK if we remove all nested
> namespace and stay with one unique flat namespace: lyx.
At least it would make sense. This was my point.
JMarc
> > shouldn't LFUN_MATH_INSERT have func_type Math instead of Edit?
>
> I think so. Who changed this to Edit?
nobody.
$ git log --decorate -p LyXAction.cpp |grep -E
'Author:|Date:|trunk@|LFUN_MATH_INSERT'|grep -B4 Edit
Author: bpeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Oct 18 15:48:51 2007 +
> shouldn't LFUN_MATH_INSERT have func_type Math instead of Edit?
I think so. Who changed this to Edit?
regards Uwe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:12:46 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
we decide to ignore it.
What was the rationale for this decision?
Abdel wants to remov
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
using 'namespace lyx::support' instead of the tens of 'using
support::xxx'. I'll do that now.
This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace,
I was not there when the support namespace was added but I gue
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:12:46 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
>> we decide to ignore it.
>
> What was the rationale for this decision?
Abdel wants to remove lines.
JMarc
On Thursday 13 December 2007 09:12:46 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
> we decide to ignore it.
What was the rationale for this decision?
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> using 'namespace lyx::support' instead of the tens of 'using
> support::xxx'. I'll do that now.
This is getting ridiculous. We are adding our own namespace, and then
we decide to ignore it.
JMarc
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 22:18:15 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> >> Can we make this the default?
> >
> > Probably. But I don't see a huge benefit. To you think it is easier to
> > discover how to separate tabbed widgets into individual docks than the
> > other way round?
>
> Personally I wo
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:08:35AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Create a new lyx file and insert an image. Any format will do, except
eps. Now try View->DVI. You will be informed that your format could
not be convert
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Even without #ifdef, selectionChanged() is in Qt4.1.
I see. The better. I'll backport your fix.
Jürgen
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Create a new lyx file and insert an image. Any format will do, except
eps. Now try View->DVI. You will be informed that your format could
not be converted to eps and are suggested to define a proper converter.
However, after clicking OK, the dvi previewer is launched and
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:36:49AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Thu Dec 13 08:36:47 2007
New Revision: 22117
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22117
Log:
add FileName::renameTo() method.
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/support/FileName.cp
41 matches
Mail list logo
