Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:14:43 2007
New Revision: 17027
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17027
Log:
Fix bug 3194:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:44:09PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Let me be more provoking. So, to solve a bug related to PDF files generated
> > by an obscure application on Mac, you are willing to break LyX on an entire
> > platform?!
>
> No, of course not. Note that the bug was there on all platf
> marginnote.sty not found.
>
> Looking i the preamble, I see a really long list of definitions and packages.
> Is this really necessary?
Yes beause it's an "extended" manual. As in Extended.lyx there are also descriptions how to solve
special problems using ERT and preamble commands. (I collect
> Uwe, unless a solution is found quickly, I will indeed revert this
> change for 1.4.4.
Done so:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17030
but only for the 1.4.x branch. It's still in trunk until we have a decision
about this.
p.s. sorry for my late replies but I nowadays get some emails from th
> Let me be more provoking. So, to solve a bug related to PDF files generated
> by an obscure application on Mac, you are willing to break LyX on an entire
> platform?!
No, of course not. Note that the bug was there on all platforms, not only on
Windows.
Just to answer you comparison: System Sol
On 2/3/07, John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/3881
Interesting. Do they svn blame every lyx file to calculte comment
ratio and main language?
I hope that I can collect my $55000x0.9 in some way. :-)
Bo
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/3881
john
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:14:43 2007
New Revision: 17027
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17027
Log:
Fix bug 3194:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
This also seems to fi
Edwin Leuven wrote:
is drawn with the wrong horizontal offset...
This is already in bugzilla.
Abdel.
Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2007 21:05 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >> i prefer it centered too. but if i remember well there is the question
of
> >> whether to use \centering or \begin{center} ... \end{center}
> >
> > No, this is solved (we use \beg
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
i prefer it centered too. but if i remember well there is the question of
whether to use \centering or \begin{center} ... \end{center}
No, this is solved (we use \begin{centering} ... \end{centering}).
I don't understand, what is solved?
Abdel.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ve some remarks about your patch. I
> Peter> think the code can be further
>>> simplified.
>
> Peter> I've checked in attached simplified patch.
>
> Here are some additio
is drawn with the wrong horizontal offset...
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:14:43 2007
New Revision: 17027
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17027
Log:
Fix bug 3194:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
This also seems to fix the annoying mouse
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:14:43 2007
New Revision: 17027
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17027
Log:
Fix bug 3194:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
This also seems to fix the annoying mouse cursor movement bug 3023:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I am speaking about software delivered with the latest Solaris 10
> release. If they bundle an old version, I cannot do much about it.
> These are production machines which cannot follow the update strategy
> followed in Debian/unstable/testing, for example, but rather t
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Following this logic, I should update each component of my OS everytime
>> an application pretends that I should have the latest/shinest versions
>> without a real need for them.
> >
> > Version: @(#)ImageMagick 5.4.7 07/01/02 Q:16 http://www.imagemagick.org
> > Copyright: C
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:39:08PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Following this logic, I should update each component of my OS everytime
> > an application pretends that I should have the latest/shinest versions
> > without a real need for them.
> >
> > Version: @(#)ImageMagick 5.4.7 07/01/02 Q:16
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Its provoking, but do we have to take care about such old program versions?
Yes (IMHO).
> If yes we'll be technically limited in fixing bugs related to third-party
> products and for new features. For example the new unicode stuff is only
> possible with teTeX 3 (2 years old).
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > 2. The linebreaks inside captions need to be \protect'ed. This is why you
> > get the LaTeX error (1.4 protects line breaks).
>
> Could you take care of that please? I am not well versed in LateX...
fixed by Jean-Marc.
Jürgen
Uwe,
with an ordinary teTeX setup from openSuse 10.2, I get the following errors
when trying to view that document:
Error 1:
\ProcessOptionsWithKV{caption}
Try typingto proceed.
If that doesn't work, type X to quit.
Error 2:
marginnote.sty not foun
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> i prefer it centered too. but if i remember well there is the question of
> whether to use \centering or \begin{center} ... \end{center}
No, this is solved (we use \begin{centering} ... \end{centering}).
Jürgen
Following this logic, I should update each component of my OS everytime
an application pretends that I should have the latest/shinest versions
without a real need for them.
>
> Version: @(#)ImageMagick 5.4.7 07/01/02 Q:16 http://www.imagemagick.org
> Copyright: Copyright (C) 2002 ImageMagick Stud
Helge Hafting wrote:
> The problem here is that \pagestyle{scrheadings} happens early,
> before \usepackage{scrpage2}. The latter comes from the .layout file.
There would be more cases where we'd need to insert something in the preamble
earlier (from textclass level). Think of the recent problem
Dear all,
There is a repeatable crash:
1. create a new doc
2. enter:
\usepackage{setspace}
\doublespace
in the preamble.
3. view->pdf
crash with assertion error:
Assertion triggered in lyx::support::FileName::FileName(const
std::string&) by failing check "!contains(name_, '\\')" in file
src/su
I also vote for default centering. It is not a big issue, but I don't
think that I have ever left a float justified.
Dave Raymond
Angus Leeming writes:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By default, when a float is created, the paragraph style is justified
> > whereas it sh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Fri Feb 2 16:14:43 2007
New Revision: 17027
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17027
Log:
Fix bug 3194:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
This also seems to fix the annoying mouse cursor movement bug 3023:
It turns out that this w
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:46:27PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:32:11PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Besides, could you give me one single reason as to why it is _so_
> >> important to place the label inside the section as oppose
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> If it is a LateX default them I don't understand the
Abdelrazak> rational of having the caption centred by default but not
Abdelrazak> the graphics or the table.
Ha! You thing that captions ar
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The following patch cleans up the insetcaption code wrt allowing
>>> inset insertion:
I committed the patch, and re-allowed the following LFUNs, for which I
do not see a need to act:
- case LFUN_PARAGRAPH_MOVE_UP:
-
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ve some remarks about your patch. I
Peter> think the code can be further
simplified.
Peter> I've checked in attached simplified patch.
Here are some additional changes (the par
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The following patch cleans up the insetcaption code wrt allowing
inset insertion:
- allow graphics inset, since it has been working for some time
(but I forgot to
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You seem to miss the fact this is all about a LateX limitation, not
>> LyX.
Enrico> Abdel, do you know LaTeX?
Since I am a cheap oldtimer, I only have the original LaTeX 2.09
documentation. However, at page 187, it says: "\label
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:21:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Once, someone noted that he didn't succeed in trying to convince latex
people to switch to lyx. If lyx starts getting in the way such that I
cannot do what I could directly do i
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The following patch cleans up the insetcaption code wrt allowing
>> inset insertion:
>>
>> - allow graphics inset, since it has been working for some time
>> (but I forgot to tell)
Abde
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> No the question is to understand _why_ a reference causes a problem
>> there. My understanding was that it was because the argument to
>> \section is a moving argument, and I thus propose
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ve some remarks about your patch. I
Peter> think the code can be further
>> simplified.
Peter> I've checked in attached simplified patch.
Here are some additional changes (the part in geometry stuff is j
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:35:12PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:32:11PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> >> The end-result will be 100% the same because this is how LateX works.
> >
> > LaTeX let me do what I want, LyX not anymore.
>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:21:25PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Once, someone noted that he didn't succeed in trying to convince latex
> > people to switch to lyx. If lyx starts getting in the way such that I
> > cannot do what I could directly do in latex, afte
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:32:11PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Besides, could you give me one single reason as to why it is _so_
important to place the label inside the section as opposed to rightly
after.
Because I could have redefined the \label command to do so
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:32:11PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The end-result will be 100% the same because this is how LateX works.
LaTeX let me do what I want, LyX not anymore.
Look at the log, it has been reverted since this morning...
Abdel.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:32:11PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:07:31PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> In the mean time, I still think that my commit is an improvement over
> >> current situation. It is nice to say that we sho
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The following patch cleans up the insetcaption code wrt allowing inset
insertion:
- allow graphics inset, since it has been working for some time (but I
forgot to tell)
What is this about?
- use insetAllowed to disallow some insets (as should be)
I just fol
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:07:31PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
In the mean time, I still think that my commit is an improvement over
current situation. It is nice to say that we should educate the user
but, IMHO, the less thing he has to learn in order to use LyX,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:32:06AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Labels could be turned to paragraph parameters, like we do in maths. I
> do not know whether there are real cases where someone needs precise
> placement.
Whatever the solution you adopt, please consider the following.
I don
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Once, someone noted that he didn't succeed in trying to convince latex
people to switch to lyx. If lyx starts getting in the way such that I
cannot do what I could directly do in latex, after more than ten years
I may even consider to continue using lyx instead of some o
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:49:29AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > In the mean time, I still think that my commit is an improvement over
> > current situation. It is nice to say that we should educate the user
> > but, IMHO, the less thing he has to learn in ord
The following patch cleans up the insetcaption code wrt allowing inset
insertion:
- allow graphics inset, since it has been working for some time (but I
forgot to tell)
- use insetAllowed to disallow some insets (as should be)
The is still the input inset that has been forbidden, and I am no
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:38:30AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> So, shall I remove that option? Not everyone has the latest svn/cvs
> >> version of ImageMagick, and version 5.4.7 is what comes with a
> >> Solaris 10 ins
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:02:20AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I removed it because the figure inset would be unusable on Solaris.
> > Jean-Marc, may I remove it in 1.4.x, too?
>
> Please don't play bug ping pong (or if you do so, at least reopen the old
> bug).
Tha
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> If it is a LateX default them I don't understand the
Abdelrazak> rational of having the caption centred by default but not
Abdelrazak> the graphics or the table.
Ha! You thing that captions are centered! Actually they
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Is this configurable anywhere? I prefer it too as Abdel does.
i prefer it centered too. but if i remember well there is the question of whether to use \centering
or \begin{center} ... \end{center}
...
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
1.5 have become a joy to use, so I use it more and more for real work.
The biggest problem right now is scrollbar autorepeat that don't stop
immediately when the mouse button is released.
Load the user guide. Click the down-arrow on the scrollbar, a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I strongly disagree. It is very natural to insert a label when the
cursor is inside a section. The label is a _markup_... the concept
is not very far from the numbering of the caption labels. Do we
ha
Bo Peng wrote:
A weird effect, but easy to fix by moving that math bar to the side.
I can not reproduce this with qt4.2.2. If you are using windows, maybe
you can download today's snapshot from http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng and
see if you can reproduce it?
I don't use windows, so I can't. This is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
No the question is to understand _why_ a reference causes a problem
there. My understanding was that it was because the argument to
\section is a moving argument, and I thus propose to just \protect the
\ref. Now Uwe tells us that both Herbert and the hyperref author (
Helge Hafting wrote:
1.5 have become a joy to use, so I use it more and more for real work.
The biggest problem right now is scrollbar autorepeat that don't stop
immediately when the mouse button is released.
Load the user guide. Click the down-arrow on the scrollbar, and hold it
down for 5s. Ob
Dear Helge,
The problem is that the scrolling algorithm is based on heuristics.
I have a patch for use LFUN_PAGE_UP/DOWN and LFUN_CURSOR_UP/DOWN that
will solve the problem.
I works quite well except from one problem: sometimes, the cursor
selection state is not restored correctly.
This sele
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:25:33PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
Load the user guide. Click the down-arrow on the scrollbar, and hold it
down for 5s. Observe how LyX keeps scrolling for two more seconds
after releasing the mouse. This makes holding down the
scrollbar arr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Hi, to my surprise, LyXText::DEPM does not need a LyXText
Michael> object but solely operates on cursors.
Michael> To simplify the use of DEPM in other contexts (CT comes to my
Michael> mind), I suggest
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
By default, when a float is created, the paragraph style is justified
whereas it should be centred. This is pretty annoying as the inserted
table or figure will be justified to the left.
Could somebody who has enough knowledge about paragraph styles do this
c
Georg Baum wrote:
The patch does not document the current situation correctly. This sentence
is wrong:
+By the way, you could have put the label right anywhere within the
section's
+ text as well but before the next section or subsection; section references
You cannot put the label in a section
Angus Leeming wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
By default, when a float is created, the paragraph style is justified
whereas it should be centred. This is pretty annoying as the inserted
table or figure will be justified to the left.
I believe we do as LaTeX does, which is
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> In the mean time, I still think that my commit is an improvement over
> current situation. It is nice to say that we should educate the user
> but, IMHO, the less thing he has to learn in order to use LyX, the better.
>
> What do others think?
Since you ask (and it's f
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:32:55 + (UTC)
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By default, when a float is created, the paragraph style is justified
> > whereas it should be centred. This is pretty annoying as the inserted
> > table or figur
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> 2. optional auto hide toolbar,
Bo> I don't see this.
These are the new ui files (default-alltoolbars, default-autotoolbars)
that are present in 1.4.4svn and offer some predefined settings.
JMarc
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> We are currently releasing a new version of my day job's
Andre> bread-and-butter product for four versions of Windows and
Andre> fifteen(!) variations of Linux. And yes, there are Qt 4.2 based
Andre> components in there.
And how man
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Hi, to my surprise, LyXText::DEPM does not need a LyXText
Michael> object but solely operates on cursors.
Michael> To simplify the use of DEPM in other contexts (CT comes to my
Michael> mind), I suggest making two method static.
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, shall I remove that option? Not everyone has the latest svn/cvs
>> version of ImageMagick, and version 5.4.7 is what comes with a
>> Solaris 10 installation.
Enrico> I removed it because the figure inset would be unusable on
E
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I strongly disagree. It is very natural to insert a label when the
>> cursor is inside a section. The label is a _markup_... the concept
>> is not very far from the numbering of the caption labels. Do we
>> have user complaining about not
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> No, you misunderstood me. I mean there is no reason why a user would
> prefer the label before, after or in the middle of the section; he
> should not care and this should be done automatically for him.
This is your opinion. But as you can see from Enricos answer users
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The problem is definitely not that the section is numbered.
Abdelrazak> In the LyX context that's definitely the problem.
Do you have _one_ good reason to believe that??
Abdelrazak> But as I said in the comments, I can repl
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I removed it because the figure inset would be unusable on Solaris.
> Jean-Marc, may I remove it in 1.4.x, too?
Please don't play bug ping pong (or if you do so, at least reopen the old
bug). A proper solution would be to check for the imagemagick version in
configure.p
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> It is nice to say that we should educate the user but, IMHO, the less
>>> thing he has to learn in order to use LyX, the better.
>>
>> Especially so when the Tutorial doesn't teach the correct way:
As you found o
74 matches
Mail list logo
