OK to apply?
Note that I plan to separate the start function, put things before
load files to create_view, load files to lyx_main.C (since they are
identical across frontends). I can prepare a bigger patch if you
prefer.
Bo
Hi,
with the help of Bennett's install instructions, I compiled LyX 1.4.2
on my Intel Mac using gcc 4.0 and Qt 3.3.6. However, while testing
the Application, I noticed a problem with the menus and keyboard
shortcuts that seems to be identical to what has been reported by
A.S.Hodel in this
Dear list,
Currently, if a help document is reload by the session system, it will
be added to lastfile list. This patch corrects this.
OK to apply?
Bo
Index: src/frontends/gtk/lyx_gui.C
===
--- src/frontends/gtk/lyx_gui.C (revision
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:02:02AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > It works for me. Using hidecmd from a shortcut to start LyX I have
> > no flashing cmd window and LyX starts normally.
>
> I tried your version, mine, and the merged one. All of them hide lyx.
> I use winxp sp2, what do you use? Anyway,
On 7/25/06, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I am forced to link to libcmt.lib and my version of hidecmd.exe
> is 6k, comparable to Enrico's mingw version. The orginal program size
> is 1.5k.
Given that all this thing does is launch the real lyx
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, I am forced to link to libcmt.lib and my version of hidecmd.exe
> is 6k, comparable to Enrico's mingw version. The orginal program size
> is 1.5k.
Given that all this thing does is launch the real lyx once, I don't think you
need worry about code size. I
I say, go for it. The LyX executable compiled in the main tree would become
lyxc.exe, a console app, and your thin WinGUI wrapper would be lyx.exe. If our
users need to debug a problem, they just invoke lyxc.exe from the command line.
The patches have been submitted. I will leave to the install
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | BTW, would you welcome a patch to remove the hide console trick in
> | os_win32.C? The trick is ugly (personal opinion) and prevents us from
> | viewing stdout during debugging.
> I do not really have a view on that You windows people have to
>
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > I am fine with either.
|
| Then I will put it under development/Win32. I hope that I can get the
| svn properties right this time.
|
| BTW, would you welcome a patch to remove the hide console trick in
| os_win32.C? The trick is ugly (personal opinio
I am fine with either.
Then I will put it under development/Win32. I hope that I can get the
svn properties right this time.
BTW, would you welcome a patch to remove the hide console trick in
os_win32.C? The trick is ugly (personal opinion) and prevents us from
viewing stdout during debugging.
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Where do you plan to put a tool like this?
|
| There is a cygwin equivalence under development/Win32 so I plan to put
| this there as well. If Joost likes it and want to take it over, he can
| put this along with the windows installer.
|
| I am fine with
Where do you plan to put a tool like this?
There is a cygwin equivalence under development/Win32 so I plan to put
this there as well. If Joost likes it and want to take it over, he can
put this along with the windows installer.
I am fine with both options.
Bo
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > It works for me. Using hidecmd from a shortcut to start LyX I have
| > no flashing cmd window and LyX starts normally.
|
| I tried your version, mine, and the merged one. All of them hide lyx.
| I use winxp sp2, what do you use? Anyway, I guess it is time
It works for me. Using hidecmd from a shortcut to start LyX I have
no flashing cmd window and LyX starts normally.
I tried your version, mine, and the merged one. All of them hide lyx.
I use winxp sp2, what do you use? Anyway, I guess it is time to hand
this to Uwe/Joost and let them try this wi
This would make sense only if msvc produces a very big executable.
After stripping it, the executable produced by gcc is about 5Kb and
I would be surprised if msvc does much worse than that.
The author's version is less than 1k I have not reproduced
(checked) that by myself though.
Bo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:11:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> // The original author used some tricks to reduce executable
> // size. They are removed to make the program compatible to
> // mingw/gcc.
>
> Rather than comment these #pragmas out, why not pro
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
// The original author used some tricks to reduce executable
// size. They are removed to make the program compatible to
// mingw/gcc.
Rather than comment these #pragmas out, why not protect them with a #ifdef
MSVC block?
Angus
// do not link to default libra
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:49:05PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Nope, I am using it from a shortcut. You have to specify the full path
> > to lyx.exe 'hidecmd C:\Programs\LyX14\bin\lyx.exe'.
>
> Enrico,
>
> I have tried again and studied the source. What you described seems to
> be wrong. hidecmd.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> | I think so, but pkg-config does not give us moc and uic.
>
> No, but does it have to?
>
> We know that if qt-mt is installed, then moc and uic is there as well.
> They can only have a few valid names. (My guess is moc-qt3
Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
|
| > So what I plan to do is to stor ucs-4 in our paragraph vector, when
| > rendering transforms that in a frontend specific way to something the
| > frontend can handle. For Qt this is ucs-2 strings, and use that t
On Monday 24 July 2006 23:41, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> I know there is a Ugaritic package for LaTeX. But is it really serious to
> multiply the memory cost of LyX for the two thousand people in the world
> that can write cuneiforms ?
With all the due respect Charles but if you ever saw lyx sp
21 matches
Mail list logo
