Minimum HW requirement

2006-07-04 Thread Alex
Dear all, One student who makes her diplom about "Comparing LyX to another Word processors", asked me about the minimum HW required fo LyX. I run (I tried it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] without success) LyX on slow computer, but it was hard to get use it (1.3.3 with linux). As far, I can remember LyX c

Re: [Cvslog] r14337 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/lib: ChangeL...

2006-07-04 Thread Angus Leeming
> Author: bpeng > Date: Tue Jul 4 15:58:52 2006 > New Revision: 14337 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/14337 > Log: > lib/configure.py: fix checkTeXAllowSpaces, by Enrico > > Modified: > lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/lib/ChangeLog > lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/lib/configu

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I am a scientific who happens to like C++ development (and who think > | he is quite good at it ;-)). I am not a professional in the software > | business and don't to be. I guess most LyX developers are the same as > | me, ar

Re: [Path] WorkArea eradication from BufferView, step 2: fix scrollbar handling

2006-07-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> So there is currently _no_ linux distribution that has a qt4 > >> really good enough for LyX? > > Andre> The point is that there is currently no distribution

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:36:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> (But if you then also add -> "and change emit to emitSignal" then > >> that is not the case anymore.) > > Abdelrazak> If you really think what you are

Re: Change Tracking - Status Update

2006-07-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: > Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were > supporting the french team yesterday. :-) Supporting a French team in Torino? Looks like I lost track of the village wars in Southern Europe. > The only thin

Re: Removal of Xforms from trunk

2006-07-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Talking about xforms, how far ahead is your Unicode patch? > > Writing and reading files work, inseting work. All > control keys crash LyX instantly... remember I asked for hel

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Joost Verburg
Enrico Forestieri wrote: I installed LyX using the installer by Joost to test them on a pure win32 environment. They work provided that the patch I posted earlier in this thread is applied to dvipost. I'll include this patch in the next version of the installer. Joost

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:48:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bo> Attached are my versions of the configure.py patch. I use r""" """ > Bo> to improve readability. I also replace \t with spaces in the > Bo> original 1.5 patch, which is

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 01:24:45PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: > > > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:34, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> Ops, forgot to ":set expandtab" in vim. Why not put a > >> "# vim: set et ts=4 sw=4:" line at the end of python scripts? > > > > I am not against s

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
On 7/4/06, John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > John Levon wrote: > > No review is done > > This is better than code does not get committed, given that the > developer is competent. There really is no developer I've ever m

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Angus Leeming
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's much better to make 10 commits during 3 hours. Then each diff is > manageable in a review, and it is technically easier to revert. > > Lars has a point that it can improve your workflow when you need to > think small, self-contained steps. B

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: | > Georg Baum wrote: | > >The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and | > >works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. | > >Jean-Marc, also for 1.4

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I propose that LyX adopts a direct-commit policy for developers who | have demonstrated that they know the rules AND are competent, AND can | commit time to work on LyX. Knowing the rules are not enough. You must at least try to follow them as wel

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > John Levon wrote: > > No review is done > > This is better than code does not get committed, given that the > developer is competent. There really is no developer I've ever met who doesn't need review, and I work with some v

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
John Levon wrote: > No review is done This is better than code does not get committed, given that the developer is competent. > > 3) Commit early and often. But as I understand it, this is the bone of contention anyway. If they need to do this, it is not a huge burden to get patch review, su

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:34, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> Ops, forgot to ":set expandtab" in vim. Why not put a >> "# vim: set et ts=4 sw=4:" line at the end of python scripts? > > I am not against such a change. :-) > The same applies for emacs settings although we are

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 10:45:11AM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > The main risks are: > > - There will be a known problem which the developer does not have time > to fix until a week or two later. Then something happens, and it never > gets done This is still a risk even with review. Revi

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:34, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Ops, forgot to ":set expandtab" in vim. Why not put a > "# vim: set et ts=4 sw=4:" line at the end of python scripts? I am not against such a change. :-) The same applies for emacs settings although we are using the emacs default setti

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bo> Attached are my versions of the configure.py patch. I use r""" """ Bo> to improve readability. I also replace \t with spaces in the Bo> original 1.5 patch, which is not allowed now. Bo> Please confirm that they still work under windows. Bo If

Re: \nonstopmode does not work

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:03:54AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > Attached are my versions of the configure.py patch. I use r""" """ to > improve readability. Indeed, they're more readable. > I also replace \t with spaces in the original > 1.5 patch, which is not allowed now. Ops, forgot to ":set exp

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and > >works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. > >Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? > > atm i cannot compile lyx out of the box on my debi

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Edwin Leuven
Georg Baum wrote: The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? atm i cannot compile lyx out of the box on my debian unstable, and i need georg's patch (updated one attached) why not pu

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Definitely. But does your answer mean you are not opposed to it? Lars> Not as opposed as I used to be :-) This is what I had in mind :) JMarc

Re: LyX development, the way forward (IMHO)

2006-07-04 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
I propose that LyX adopts a direct-commit policy for developers who have demonstrated that they know the rules AND are competent, AND can commit time to work on LyX. Each commit results in a diff sent to the list for post-festum review mainly as a sanity check and such that Lars and others can

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> If we go the macro way (and we should be very careful about | Lars> this), then we should go even a bit further. | | Lars> We should then use a macro that adds the BOOST_C

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> If we go the macro way (and we should be very careful about Lars> this), then we should go even a bit further. Lars> We should then use a macro that adds the BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, Lars> and __FILE__ and __LINE__ always to the

Re: [patch] merge booktabs branch

2006-07-04 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > A question: > + The tag of tabulars has the following new attributes: > + topspace, bottomspace and interlinespace. All take a LyXLength > + as value, or the special keyword "default". > > Are these new spacing for booktabs only? No, but the nonbooktabs

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or two for | > me. | | Really? A _very_ coarse test really. I might be mistaken. Howver it cannot hurt. | Wow! Did John Torjo's logging li

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or | Lars> two for me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any | Lars> harm, so committing. | | Isn't

Re: Translation for LyX 1.4.2

2006-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tomasz" == Tomasz Łuczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tomasz> Hi Jean-Marc You can find in attachment updated pl.po file. Hi Tomasz, Thanks for the file. It is in now. JMarc

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or two for > me. Really? Wow! Did John Torjo's logging library ever make it into Boost? IIRC, using it would be equivalent to your change here. > void BufferView::Pimpl::update(Update::f

Re: Slight speedup of BufferView::Pimpl::update

2006-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or Lars> two for me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any Lars> harm, so committing. Isn't it possible to do this in a more compact way? If we use macros,

Re: [patch] Get rid of a few warnings.

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > I belive this one is safe. (I'll commit after work tomorrow(today)) | > Index: src/text2.C | > === | > --- src/text2.C (revision 14329) | > +++ src/text2.C