Hi, Enrico,
I just compiled and tested lyx/cygwin 1.4.x/1.5.x. I am happy to see
that the quit problem has been fixed so they both look quite usable.
Do you notice any big issue of these version? If not, maybe it is time
for me to join that cygwin-package mailing list.
Bo
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Writing and reading files work, inseting work. All
| > control keys crash LyX instantly... remember I asked for help?
|
| If major coding has been done and you just need to make everything
| work as usual, I would suggest that you merge your branch to th
Hi, Lar,
I am really happy about your decision regarding xforms and gtk. This
will make everyone's life easier.
| Talking about xforms, how far ahead is your Unicode patch?
Writing and reading files work, inseting work. All
control keys crash LyX instantly... remember I asked for help?
If
On Sunday 02 July 2006 21:57, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
>
> No need to shout Michael :-)
I leave you (all) alone for 4 days and is this what you do? ;-)
Torino (Turin) is a fine place, and I should tell you that they were
supportin
Eventually, I guess we'll work out the management difficulties we have
(had?).
Welcome back! Your Friday humor triggered another round of discussion
and now xform is eventually being removed. Now, you need to split your
patch and get to work. :-)
Bo
Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I think we all are frustrated.
Then we have at least one thing in common.
Or maybe two: I WANT TO HAVE ABDEL BACK IN THIS PROJECTS.
No need to shout Michael :-)
Abdel, pleease!
I might very well succumb to this love declaration, care t
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Talking about xforms, how far ahead is your Unicode patch?
Writing and reading files work, inseting work. All
control keys crash LyX instantly... remember I asked for help?
And I need something like the any patch in...
| About gtk, I got this beaut
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:06:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | the 3rd step would be to follow john spray's suggestion, and keep
> | track of backend changes that affect gtk on the wiki or another
> | appropriate place
>
> I'll even take this
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This removes the source files and everything I could identify as
| belonging to xforms in the autoconf machinery.
|
| I do not know what to do with po/*. Am I right in assuming that stuff in
| there will get fixed automatically?
Not quite. But close.
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| the 3rd step would be to follow john spray's suggestion, and keep
| track of backend changes that affect gtk on the wiki or another
| appropriate place
I'll even take this one further... as long as there seems to be no
active gtk developers we should do
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Since this sees to be the one of the main things we have heated
debates on, we might as well get rid of it. I still have some
reservations, but it is not as if I am ever going to use xforms
myself.
So unless I get objections, I will remove XForms from trunk tomorrow
ev
Since this sees to be the one of the main things we have heated
debates on, we might as well get rid of it. I still have some
reservations, but it is not as if I am ever going to use xforms
myself.
So unless I get objections, I will remove XForms from trunk tomorrow
evening. (Almost a bit sad...
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I really hope Abdel will reconsider,
why don't you tell him that you are willing to trust him more as long as
he makes a serious effort to stick to the rules? (be a bit less of a
micro-manager and a bit more a macro-manager)
i am sure that *if* abdel is to reconsi
The point is, we have already that tab-for-logical-indetation-space-for
aligment for our C++ code. People are used to it, and it is known to
accomodate a wide range of personal preferences. People also obviously
have sufficiently capable editors, otherwise they'd be in trouble to
have there patche
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:52:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > No, but I would expect Qt4 to behave the same way on different
> | > platforms.
> |
> | There are compl
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Helge> People who run an old distribution runs whatever old lyx that
> Helge> distribution distributes, don't they?
>
> If LyX is important to them, having a new
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Now that you reached that point you might as well consider letting those
> | people decide what's being done that actually do any coding. At least if
> | there are clear majoritie
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:59:24AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >I still don't get why it should be dangerous, and since that rule exists
> >for
> >C++ already you have to configure your editor anyway, so I don't see the
> >problem. If you have an example where the C++ rule would be dangerous
> >please
On 7/2/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... I susually do not use '+' to concatenate strings in pythong. I
> use '"latex -interaction=onstopmode %s" % wtmpfname' instead.
My last email was irrelevant, and was from a state of morning
confusion. As of ' ' + s vs '%s' %string, I use %s
Hmm... I susually do not use '+' to concatenate strings in pythong. I
use '"latex -interaction=onstopmode %s" % wtmpfname' instead.
Using a single string is of course better. I was thinking in a way
like: ok, we need to *add* this option. :-)
Bo
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi, Lars,
|
| The following patch is needed to prevent lib/configure.py from hanging
| when the latex test fails (latex will wait for user interaction). It
| is in the trunk now, OK for 1.4.x?
J-M's domain, but I cannot see why not.
I know that we have us
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:19:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > GuiWorkArea::~GuiWorkArea()
| > {
| > }
| > @@ -459,7 +461,7 @@ void GuiWorkArea::update(int x, int y, i
| > //QPainter q(&screen_device_);
| > //q.drawImage(x, y
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:19:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> GuiWorkArea::~GuiWorkArea()
> {
> }
> @@ -459,7 +461,7 @@ void GuiWorkArea::update(int x, int y, i
> //QPainter q(&screen_device_);
> //q.drawImage(x, y, paint_device_.copy(x, y, w, h));
>
> - viewport(
23 matches
Mail list logo
